Search for: "English v. English" Results 9461 - 9480 of 11,202
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
These are analogous powers that the English Superior Courts had under the prerogative writs of mandamus, certiorari, prohibition, habeas corpus and quo-warranto. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
  Appellate Division, Third Department  Improper to discredit Respondent’s denial of paternity on the basis that  he never definitively took steps to dissuade the child or anyone else that he was NOT the father             In Matter of Montgomery County Dept of Social Services o/b/o Donavin E, v Trini G 195 A.D.3d 1069, 149 N.Y.S.3d 667 (3d Dept.,2021)  petitioner commenced a proceeding seeking… [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 12:41 am by CMS
He refers to Burmah Oil v LA [1964] UKHL 6 noting there appeared to be no difference between the Scottish and English position on prorogation. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 7:24 am by Eleonora Rosati
But, it could be the beginning of change, and an indication that English courts may seek to shift the historic balance between the rights of platforms and brand/content owners towards the latter. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 11:11 pm by Sam Murrant
Welcome back to the UK Human Rights Roundup, your weekly smorgasbord of human rights news. [read post]
The Trump Court may undo this, and overrule the gay marriage case (Obergefell v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 9:30 am by Thomas Lee
For instance, the ATS was successfully invoked by a French privateer (an alien plaintiff) in Bolchos v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:31 am by Amanda L. Tyler
” Neither the Supreme Court’s earlier immigration decision in INS v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am by Graham Smith
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
You have come to the right place (IP Dragon) Court protects transliteration of well-known international enterprise name (International Law Office) How to go to China for innovation (China Law Blog)   Costa Rica Costa Rica approves Free Trade Agreement between US, Central America and Dominican Republic (CAFTA) (IP tango)   Europe EU judges on Community patent and court (IAM) (Managing Intellectual Property) European IP forum considers standards-setting (Managing Intellectual… [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) (Out-Law) ECJ rules German music distributor cannot sell two Bob Dylan compilation albums because Sony owns rights to songs in question: Sony Music Entertainment (Germany) GmbH v Falcon Neue Medien Vertrieb GmbH (IPKat) (Law360) ECJ: Date set for Advocate General’s opinion in L'Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie v Bellure NV, Malaika… [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 am by INFORRM
The High Court found that the English Court had no jurisdiction to hear the case, and held that even if it had jurisdiction, the judge would have [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
We have had previous posts on the cases of Robins v Kordowski [2011] EWHC 981 (QB)) (seehere), Awdry, Bailey and Douglas v Kordowksi, Farrall v Kordowksi [2010] EWHC 2436 (QB) (see here), Phillips v Kordowski and Mazzola v Kordowski. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm by INFORRM
Research & resources The Justice Gap website is also supporting the ‘Open Justice Week’ initiative (see events, below) and has published a guide to reporting the English courts by Kim Evans, with input from David Banks, Philippa Thomas and Rupert Evelyn. [read post]