Search for: "In re: Justice v."
Results 9461 - 9480
of 17,917
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2014, 1:10 pm
[i] Brief of the Rutherford Institute, Amicus Curiae in Support of the Petitioner, Heien v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 1:10 pm
[i] Brief of the Rutherford Institute, Amicus Curiae in Support of the Petitioner, Heien v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 9:48 am
See, for example, R v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 4:37 am
Copyright © 2014 Simple Justice NY, LLC This feed is for personal, non-commercial and Newstex use only. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 10:10 pm
In the concluding chapter, I begin by strongly criticizing an opinion by Justice Sotomayor in Hui v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 4:05 am
Smith & Philip Donoho, RLUIPA: Re-Aligning Burdens of Proof, Clarifying Freedoms, and Re-Defining Responsibilities, (New York University Journal of Legislation and Public Policy, Forthcoming).Zachary R. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 11:39 am
It shall be exercised by the people through elections and other votes and through specific legislative, executive and judicial bodies.(3) The legislature shall be bound by the constitutional order, the executive and the judiciary by law and justice.(4) All Germans shall have the right to resist any person seeking to abolish this constitutional order, if no other remedy is available.Article 20a [Protection of the natural foundations of life and animals] Mindful also of its responsibility… [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 11:36 am
I think that Justice King is on target here. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 10:47 am
” The court brought up US v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 7:40 am
Justice O’Neill wrote a dissent, joined by Justice Pfeifer. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 3:09 am
But when they speak of gravity knives today, it’s a very different animal, as revealed in Bronx Supreme Court Justice Troy Webber’s opinion in People v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
Touch the detonator in my pocket and we’re all goin’ BOOM! [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 1:02 pm
That way, you can see whether you made any mistakes and, if so, fix them within the code, rather than having to delete the code and re-mark the cite. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 1:02 pm
That way, you can see whether you made any mistakes and, if so, fix them within the code, rather than having to delete the code and re-mark the cite. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 11:41 am
Perry and with Justice Scalia’s dissent in United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am
The only old relist we’re aware of from OT2013 is Cope v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 5:07 am
You’re saying everything that is related somehow to the job is principal. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 1:27 pm
Sattva Capital Corp v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 8:56 am
“With no camp assured of victory if the court decided to hear the cases, the uncertainty may hold the key to the Justices’ thinking. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 8:40 am
"You’re telling me that if a defendant is about to go to jail, and a physicist from Harvard that wanted to say these machines are voodoo and they don’t work… you’re saying that would be improper and not admissible,“ said Justice William O’Neill. [read post]
