Search for: "LaBelle v. LaBelle"
Results 9461 - 9480
of 12,213
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2015, 1:52 pm
The current iteration of the religious-freedom challenge to the Affordable Care Act’s preventive-services mandate (not, as is sometimes suggested, to the act itself) is called Zubik v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 8:01 am
The Supreme Court yesterday issued its decision in Morrison v. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 3:33 am
In its unsigned memorandum opinion last week, the Appellate Division agreed with Justice Scheinkman that the operating agreement’s purpose clause “did not set forth any particular purpose for Pedani,” but it then labeled as “an impermissible factual finding” Justice Schienkman’s conclusion that Pedani’s purpose “was simply to acquire and manage property. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
From Bostic v. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 2:35 pm
This isn’t a problem for major record labels or big Hollywood studios. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 3:33 am
In its unsigned memorandum opinion last week, the Appellate Division agreed with Justice Scheinkman that the operating agreement’s purpose clause “did not set forth any particular purpose for Pedani,” but it then labeled as “an impermissible factual finding” Justice Schienkman’s conclusion that Pedani’s purpose “was simply to acquire and manage property. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 8:04 pm
QVC, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 8:54 am
Federal law labels them “permanent legal residents. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 8:24 am
Yesterday’s argument in County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 5:00 am
(ContentAgenda) Scotland Franz Ferdinand sends Web-Sheriff after pirates (TorrentFreak) (Techdirt) Singapore Sony Ericsson to be first in Singapore to sell major-label music files without DRM (ContentAgenda) Sweden Pirate Bay’s tour bus to become court case press centre (TorrentFreak) United Kingdom UK censors responses to piracy consultation (TorrentFreak) Framlingham College wins cybersquatting case against Canadian domain parkers… [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 3:00 am
Whole Foods Defendants cited to Stafford v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 2:42 pm
Courts have regularly applied the rationality standard in upholding special conditions requiring convicted sex offenders to secure residences approved by the Division of Parole prior to release from DOCS custody to parole supervision as in Breeden v Donelli, Lynch v West, Billups v New York State Division of Parole and Wilson v Keane. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 6:47 pm
(IP finance) United States US Patents – Decisions CAFC: In re Katz (part 2): Indefiniteness of computer processes (Patently-O) CAFC: Altair illustrates how to win by losing: Altair v Leddynamics (IPBiz) District Court E D Wisconsin: In Re Seagate does not dictate standard for pleading willful infringement claim: Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation, et. al. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 6:03 am
In Evans v. [read post]
3 Jan 2025, 3:28 pm
From Farrakhan v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 8:15 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 6:29 am
Nor was it a K v K case, because there was no shared care arrangement. [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 8:26 am
Whether labeled a TRO or a preliminary injunction, that order provided an equitable remedy,” wrote Gorsuch. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 3:23 am
The case is Trump v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 11:28 am
However, Barrett says the problem Freed faced was that his Facebook page was not labeled as official or private. [read post]
