Search for: "Levell v. State" Results 9461 - 9480 of 29,842
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2011, 12:49 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
On December 13, 2010, Judge Levin of the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas issued an Opinion supporting entry of a compulsory non-suit in favor of a property owner after ruling that a defect in the sidewalk that was only 5/8 of an inch was a trivial defect as a matter of law in the case of Alston v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 12:49 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
On December 13, 2010, Judge Levin of the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas issued an Opinion supporting entry of a compulsory non-suit in favor of a property owner after ruling that a defect in the sidewalk that was only 5/8 of an inch was a trivial defect as a matter of law in the case of Alston v. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 12:54 pm
”  At the district court level, Hydril’s complaint was dismissed for failure to state a claim. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 3:29 am
However, there was a dispute as to whether the level of compensation due was to be assessed according to English law, or the law of Spain. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 4:43 pm by Erica Vaccarello
It remains, however, that EU Member States could still prohibit, under their national laws, the use of signs which are in dubious taste, either if registration for such signs is denied or granted at European level. [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:02 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 2 A.C. 167 andPinnock adopted. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 5:05 am by Dennis Crouch
  These two firms are known for the high level of scientific and technical expertise of their attorneys. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 6:49 am
A lack of recognition of the sign as an indication of commercial origin in one part of the territory of the European Union cannot be offset by a higher level of awareness in another part of the European Union.Do I smell trade mark infringement? [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 8:42 am by Lyle Denniston
The state officials in those cases also sought to raise other issues, about the steps that state officials must take, under federal Medicaid law, before they may cut benefit levels. [read post]