Search for: "Light v. United States" Results 9461 - 9480 of 11,342
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2018, 1:02 pm by Dennis Crouch
We must be clear, lest we perpetuate the current state. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
As a consequence, the United States Supreme Court has refused to provide advisory opinions since 1793. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 10:26 am by Eric Goldman
Facebook adopted a non-interventionist policy, essentially green-lighting the worst kinds of political advertising. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 10:49 am
 So, provided that absolute and relative grounds serve different purposes -– the protection of (i) a general interest and of (ii) the individual trade mark holder -- the AG stated that the relevant public has only one overall impression of the mark -- but that, for absolute grounds of refusal of registration the focus is on possible connections between the mark or its components and the goods and services covered while, for relative grounds, the focus is on the process of… [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 2:49 am by Florian Mueller
I'm not going to do the usual preview post listing patents, products etc. before the trial in the second Apple v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 1:29 am
  [This is substantially changed - previously stated (at "sixthly") there are no grounds for presuming that duplication of proceedings would be, without further reason, grounds for a stay.] [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 5:36 pm by davidruiz
Section 702 allows the NSA to collect the communications of foreign individuals not living in the United States. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 9:00 pm by Sherica Celine
Practical Guidance Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Related Content Corporations across the United States are evaluating how they manage diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policies in the workplace in light of the recent Supreme Court decision striking down affirmative action policies on the basis of race in education, ( Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:28 am
  The original shot in this battle, arguing that the new patent package was setting a dangerous precedent since the EU Member States were stripping the Union of its powers, can be read here. [read post]