Search for: "MRS v. State"
Results 9461 - 9480
of 21,763
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2014, 5:21 pm
United States Department Of Homeland Security. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 12:25 pm
In Rates Technology, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 7:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 5:45 am
State v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Cotton & Ors, R (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & Ors [2014] EWHC 3437 (Admin) This was the Liberty backed judicial review of the bedroom tax regulations on the basis that the regulations amounted to an article 8 breach, or an article 14 breach read with article 8, or that the regulations were irrational. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 12:27 pm
" Turns out Mr. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 9:46 am
Andrus Ansip is nominally the “team leader” on the reforms, with Věra Jourová, Günther Oettinger and Dimitris Avramopoulos competing to be heard on the balance between fundamental rights, business freedoms and the powers of public authorities (e.g. state surveillance), respectively. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 6:42 am
Here are the materials in Farmer v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 8:10 pm
State v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 3:45 pm
(Finally) AA v London Borough of Southwark [2014] EWHC 500 (QB) This High Court judgment is remarkable in many ways, most of them worrying. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 9:30 am
Mr. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 9:37 pm
Peter Crowley v United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office (unreported, but noted on the Lawtel subscription-only service) is one of those cases that should never be allowed to happen. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 5:26 pm
The next day, the prosecution’s notice of the right to testify before the grand jury was served on Mr. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 2:23 pm
Or as Mr. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 12:42 pm
Mrs. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 10:42 am
You can see the e-mails here, and the judge’s decision here; I also quote the judge’s decision below: State v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 4:23 am
[Note: in Washington state, the legal threshold is 5 ng/ml.]In People v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 12:00 am
The author is occasional and much-appreciated guest contributor Suleman Ali (Holly IP), who writes as follows:Teva UK Limited & Teva Pharmaceuticals Limited v Leo Pharma A/S & Leo Laboratories Limited[2014] EWHC 3096 (Pat) is a decision by Mr Justice Birss in the Patents Court, England and Wales. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 5:22 pm
Mrs. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 6:21 am
Here are the materials in Estate of Redd v. [read post]
