Search for: "Mark"
Results 9461 - 9480
of 151,857
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2021, 4:08 am
Rather, the mark must be actually used in conjunction with the services described in the application for the mark. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 4:06 am
Petitioner does not in any way address the issue of descriptiveness of Respondent’s mark in its brief. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 3:02 am
The Board affirmed a Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark 5 GOLDEN RINGS for "beer; malt liquor," finding the mark likely to cause confusion with the registered mark GOLD RING for wines. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 3:08 am
In a rare Section 2(b) decision, the Board reversed a refusal to register the mark shown below, for various goods and services, finding that the mark does not consist of or comprise the flags of the United States or foreign nations. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 5:57 am
Mikhail Levitin T/A Mikhail Levitin Institute, Opposition No. 91202898 [Opposition to registration of the mark shown below for "anti-aging cream" on the grounds of likelihood of confusion with, and likelihood of dilution of, the registered mark L'OREAL and related marks, for beauty care products, including face cream and face lotion].March 25, 2015 - 11 AM: Premio Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 4:30 am
The USPTO refused to register the mark KOSA for "restaurant and bar services," finding confusion likely with the identical mark registered for "entertainment in the nature of music festivals and live musical performances; entertainment, namely, production of music festivals and live performances featuring music; entertainment, namely, live music concerts. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 8:33 am
If true, the proposed mark is merely descriptive. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 6:41 pm
I was wondering if I should send a friendly message asking the other events producers to respect my mark for the Houston Reggae Festival, send a cease and desist letter citing my common law trademark/servicemark, or send in my mark application first and send a cease and desist under a pending mark? [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 3:26 am
Christina Isaacs, Opposition No. 91232164 [Opposition to registration of the mark RANGER TREK for various goods and services in classes International Classes 16, 18, 21, 25, 26, 28 and 41, and the mark RANGER TREK EXPEDITION JOURNALS & Design for goods and services in classes 16 and 41, on the ground of likelihood of confusion with the allegedly famous common law and registered mark TREK and formatives thereof for a variety of products, including clothing, backpacks,… [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 3:15 am
The USPTO refused registration of the mark DASH NEIGHBORHOOD for "retail store services featuring gasoline," finding the mark likely to cause confusion with the registered mark DASH IN for "retail store services featuring convenience store items and gasoline. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 10:06 am
It is not unusual for companies to register their acronyms as trade marks. [read post]
14 May 2024, 3:25 am
None of the soap, fragrance or cosmetic/makeup products are offered under the Anthropologie or Urban Outfitters marks but are third-party products offered under third-party marks. [read post]
23 Aug 2024, 4:19 am
It reviewed a number of registrations for and uses of marks including the words "lend" or "lending" but none were as close to the registered mark as applicant's mark. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 4:00 pm
BOOKS GETTING A BOOST FROM OBAMA: Obviously, Mark Levin’s Liberty and Tyranny, and Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 2:39 am
The mark and the domain name are confusingly similar. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 3:40 am
Applicant, appearing pro se, neither submitted evidence nor filed a brief.As to the marks, the Board noted the disclaimer of DOMAINE (meaning "estate") and the large size of the word PINNACLE in applicant's mark, leading it to concluded that the word PINNACLE is the dominant term in the applied-for mark. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 10:08 am
Practice Tip #2: This complaint highlights the difference between the "®" mark and the "™" mark. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 12:48 pm
’s trade mark, while others should not have been registered as a trade mark in the first place, as Defendants claim in our case. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 7:05 am
Because the “mark uses ‘fur free’ in place of ‘faux’ to let consumers know that” the Applicant’s goods do not contain animal fur, she found that “[b]oth the individual components of Applicant’s mark, as well as the composite mark, describe Applicant’s goods. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 2:51 am
Considering the marks in their entireties, the Board found them more dissimilar than similar.There was no doubt that the marks sound different. [read post]
