Search for: "Masse v. Masse" Results 9461 - 9480 of 10,246
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2011, 7:17 pm by Frank Pasquale
As with the market fundamentalism in Lochner v. [read post]
17 May 2022, 9:36 am by Daniel Jin
Previously passed by the Senate, the bill looks to reduce carbon emissions by: (1) transitioning the state’s fleet of motor vehicles (cars or light duty trucks) to electric power with half the fleet making the transition by January 1 2026, 75% by January 1, 2028 and fully electric by January 1, 2030; (2) transitioning mass transit and school bus fleets from diesel fuel to electric; (3) giving a tenant the right to install an electric vehicle charging station without landlord… [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Under the (perhaps largely defunct) “Lemon test” from Lemon v. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 6:40 pm by Joy Waltemath
Finally, his state law whistleblower claim was dismissed because he did not identify a single law, rule, or regulation allegedly violated by the employer (Barber v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
  First of all, the Third Circuit made clear in its en banc decision in Dunn v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 5:55 am by Mutasim Ali
Second, based on the first conclusion, and as established by the ICJ in Bosnia v. [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 9:05 pm by Nina A. Mendelson
Some have responded, however, with a broadside attack on “mass” comments, criticizing individual comments as low in value, advancing the red herring that rulemaking is not a plebiscite, and concluding that the solution is to discourage even genuine individual comments. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 2:28 pm by Chip Merlin
Last night, the Florida Association of Public Insurance Adjusters (FAPIA) threw a costume party that was a hit! [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:11 am by Victoria VanBuren
Saionton was previously the law clerk to the Chief Justice of India, V N Khare. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Parity for exclusion from income for employer-provided mass transit and parking benefits (sec. 132(f))28. [read post]