Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 9461 - 9480
of 16,587
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2010, 9:38 am
Randi made his mark by attacking spoon-bender Uri Geller's claims of having psychic powers. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 6:20 pm
If Germany Had the Death Penalty: a Thought Experiment April 22 marks the 25th anniversary of the Supreme Court decision in McCleskey v. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 12:24 am
Michael Maslanka's Work Matters suggests that we consider the effect a complaint will have on our intended target before we file it. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 10:39 am
Further, charges under the $500 mark are more likely to remain on an individual’s report longer than those over $500. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 3:27 pm
Another man, Mark Young, says his son is also a sex abuse victim. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 9:39 am
The new policy from Dean Smith has a Mark McGwire-esque "I'm not here to talk about the past," ring to it. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:37 am
This morning I received the following compliment from someone concerning yesterday's post Was NSSTA Asleep At The Switch on "CSSC" mark? [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 11:25 am
But I suspect he didn’t want to do that. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 9:21 am
Those statistics make a strong case that training matters. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 7:05 am
One question that he doesn't address is how the collection of all this "collective social media data" about you and me will be used in the future. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 8:39 pm
I certainly don’t favour the American approach, since in my view, it has contributed to a legal culture that encourages frivolous litigation. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 12:15 pm
Yet that lazy, uncommitted, disinterested candidate was the only one in the race saying something that mattered. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 5:03 am
Don't let him trash talk you Micky! [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 11:39 am
"They either looked at the Bilski legal test and said it's an unworkable test, or they looked at their own precedent and decided they didn't like that," says Lemley.The last time patentable subject matter was addressed by the Supreme Court was in 1981, with Diamond v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 1:51 pm
The event that marked the end of this controversy in the mid-1990s was not a case. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 11:39 am
Simply put: If the law wasn’t clear, the courts sided with the agency’s interpretation as long as it was reasonable. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 6:39 am
This isn’t about defending Obama. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 3:27 pm
” We still have concerns with many of Facebook's privacy practices, including those we spelled out in our open letter to CEO Mark Zuckerberg last year. [read post]
28 Jan 2017, 8:46 am
Defendant argued the fall was plaintiff’s fault because he stood on the pail shelf, which is clearly marked as not for standing. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 12:18 pm
District Judge William T. [read post]
