Search for: "People v Weeks" Results 9461 - 9480 of 15,569
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2013, 12:58 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Last week, the California Appellate Court in a lengthy opinion (116 pages) overturned the murder conviction of Michael Pizarro (People v. [read post]
26 May 2013, 8:31 pm by Aparajita Lath
SpicyIP saw a very busy week with many interesting developments -Image from hereThe week started with Sai’s insightful post on Microsoft v Motorola. [read post]
26 May 2013, 6:52 am by Jeff Gamso
  Then again, he turns 81 in a couple of weeks. [read post]
24 May 2013, 6:52 am
 On the 1709 Blog, Ben Challis reveals the recent woes of the Center for Copyright Information, while on the Afro-IP weblog, we learn of the emotional roller-coaster that Isaac Rutenberg experiences when contemplating Kenya's Science Week. [read post]
24 May 2013, 1:51 am
  People generally enjoy watching people play games well and, if there is an audience for the virtual version of a chess game such as Karpov v Kasparov, should publishers and developers prevent people from filming it? [read post]
23 May 2013, 9:42 am
Last week, fellow Kat Neil delighted us with a brilliant post on one of the biggest nightmares of IP lawyers, who are so often confronted with the wisdom of the crowd. [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:58 am by Timothy P. Flynn
  In a unanimous per curiam opinion, issued without oral arguments, the Supreme Court held in People v Koon that a medical marijuana patient is legal to drive a vehicle, even with some THC in his blood.Rodney Koon was charged under the "zero tolerance" provision of the Motor Vehicle Code which proscribes driving with any amount of a Schedule 1 drug in the driver's system. [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:51 am by Liisa Speaker
The issue of operating a vehicle while internally possessing marijuana pursuant to the Michigan Medical Marijuana Act (“MMMA”) was tackled this week by the Michigan Supreme Court in its review of People v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 10:31 am by pscamp01
Brandeis” and it is published in The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process, Fall 2012, v. 13, no.2, pp. 189-197. [read post]
21 May 2013, 11:38 am by Dennis Crouch
Monsanto, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Monsanto last week. [read post]
21 May 2013, 11:29 am by NBlack
This very issue arose recently in a case out of Florida — O’Leary v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 5:31 am
Although this Kat has recently been living with a spotty connection, which almost cut him off the blogosphere for a week, he noticed that Professor Rebecca Tushnet published a new article on 'Performance Anxiety: Copyright Embodied and Disembodied'. [read post]
20 May 2013, 6:07 am by Staci Zaretsky
Hooray, a new reason for people to lose their sh*t. [read post]
19 May 2013, 1:00 pm by Giles Peaker
In practice no one had been denied a place although it was conceded at the hearing that in theory if more people had turned up than there were beds for then some would have been turned away. [read post]