Search for: "People v. Grant" Results 9461 - 9480 of 16,997
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2014, 11:08 am
People v Perkins ruled that PL §§ 265.01(1) and 400.00 are constitutional and do not run afoul of Heller. [read post]
25 May 2014, 4:04 am by J
It was important therefore to indicate what amounted to a “point of law”, so that people appealing former RAC jurisdictions knew what they could appeal on and so that people knew where s.11, TCEA 2007 stopped and s.176B CLRA 2002 / s.231C, HA 2004 started. the concept of appeal on a point of law is widely understood, particularly in appeals against decisions of tribunals. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am by John Elwood
  The Court’s relist streak continues as this week’s lone grant was again a Relist Watch alumnus: Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 11:45 am
Mandatory retirement provisions within partnership agreements do not violate labour laws or human rights, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled today in McCormick v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am by Bruce Ackerman
Our disagreement – not a small one -- is whether We the People only did great things during the Golden Age before the New Deal. [read post]
21 May 2014, 4:35 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The People have failed to justify the seizure by the officer based on the plain view doctrine and the defendant's motion to suppress the beer bottles recovered from the vehicle was granted. [read post]
21 May 2014, 12:03 pm by Benjamin Wittes
It also creates a pool of at least five people capable of serving in this capacity. [read post]
20 May 2014, 8:49 am by WIMS
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   <> People of the State of California v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 3:29 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The destruction of the unquickened fetus was not manslaughter at common law as held in Evans v People. [read post]
19 May 2014, 9:04 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Declaratory Judgment Opinions Body: AC35143 - We the People of Connecticut, Inc. v. [read post]