Search for: "State v. Doctor" Results 9461 - 9480 of 9,600
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2007, 10:06 pm
The court does not believe this construction. . .is supported by [state] case law.Woulfe v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 4:48 pm
  Most significantly for readers of this blog, she pointed out the inconsistency between his opinion in this case and his opinion for the Court in Lawrence v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 3:31 pm
The case is Gonzalez v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 12:13 pm
"  The Justices distinguished, but did not overrule, their  2000 decision, Stenberg v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:43 am
Moran (2002) -- upholding state laws giving patients the right to second doctor's opinion over HMOs' objections Kelly v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 7:20 am
(Personal plug: Kennedy's opinion accepts the argument on this point of an amicus brief by a few law profs, including yours truly.)3) The distinction on which Kennedy principally relies -- the greater specificity of the federal statute -- works for overbreadth and vagueness, but it's not clear that it should make a difference on the core issue: whether a government (state or federal) can ban what many doctors think is the safest way to perform a medical procedure. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 6:55 am
The Attorney General of New Hampshire argues that the correct procedural rule is the rule of United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 3:34 am
Moran (2002) -- upholding state laws giving patients the right to second doctor's opinion over HMOs' objectionsKelly v. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 9:24 am
"CMS is pleased to launch DOQ-IT University, the first of its kind e-learning platform, to provide assistance to physicians across the United States in the adoption and implementation of electronic health records and care management practices," said CMS Acting Administrator Leslie V. [read post]