Search for: "State v. South" Results 9461 - 9480 of 11,003
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2024, 6:49 am by Adil Ahmad Haque
Similarly, Chile’s declaration of intervention in South Africa v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 12:18 pm by Clayton Simms, Criminal Defense Attorney
City of South Salt Lake City, 140 P. 3d 1235, 1239 (2006) citing West v Thomson Newspapers 872 P.2d 999, 1004 (Utah 1994). [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 6:35 am
A simple hypothetical drawn from the facts in San Antonio v. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
United States A Washington D.C based band is suing YouTube, after the website removed its music video. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
According to the South China Morning Post, Tesla is suing Han Chao, a former tesla owner, for comments he made on social media. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 2:12 pm
US law has also protected geographic indications through common law trade mark law without need for a registration ( the "Cognac" case - Institut National Des Appellations v Brown-Forman Corp (TTAB 1998)).However, when it comes to produce and products which are of such strong cultural and heritage state significance like the New Mexico chile, it is the state's government that usually applies for a certification mark. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm by Alexandra Walsh
For example, in the seminal case Goss v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Taxes, Fees, and Government Charges on Wireless Service, July 2021, State Rankings     Wireless State-Local Rate Federal USF Rate Combined Federal/State/Local Rate  1 Illinois  22.76% 11.80% 34.56% 2 Arkansas 20.25% 11.80% 32.04% 3 Washington 20.02% 11.80% 31.81% 4 Nebraska 19.57% 11.80% 31.36% 5 New York 18.93% 11.80% 30.73% 6 Kansas 17.69% 11.80% 29.49% 7 Pennsylvania 16.67% 11.80% 28.47% 8 Utah 16.15% 11.80% 27.95% 9 Rhode Island 15.54% 11.80% 27.34%… [read post]
23 May 2011, 4:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
  One of them, In re South Canaan Cellular Investments, LLC, 2010 WL 3306907 (Bankr. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 5:06 am
Government’s position for the Supreme Court’s review of Star Athletica, L.L.C. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 5:07 pm by Guest Blogger
The use of the words “any person” in the Equal Protection Clause make it clear that the Clause does not merely benefit freed African Americans but that it also, for example, applies to protect Northern white citizens resident in the South. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
Nicklin J found that, because Ms Murray’s tweet was stated as fact, it had one meaning; the defence of truth failed. [read post]