Search for: "United States v. California" Results 9461 - 9480 of 13,839
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2012, 4:57 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
The state relies primarily on a 1976 case, De Canas v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 1:59 am
German epidemiologists initially thought including sprouts would only create false positives in case/control studies because sprouts, in general, are so common a food item.A CDC-FDA-state investigation of a similar outbreak here in the United States would focus more quickly on sprouts given the long history of sprout outbreaks. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 4:28 pm by Rick Hasen
”—Alexander Keyssar, author of The Right to Vote: The Contested History of Democracy in the United States “Rick Hasen, a law professor at the University of California, Irvine, and one of the nation’s foremost experts on election law, has published a preview of a new book with a sobering reminder for those of us who oppose the growing body of laws requiring identification in order to vote. . . [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 12:21 pm by rlargent@cdflaborlaw.com
  There have also been some significant new court decisions out of the United States Supreme Court favoring enforceability of these agreements. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 11:02 am by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 3:34 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Rptr. 331 (1988) ("At issue on this appeal is whether, by virtue of the so-called California Tidelands Trust Doctrine, the State and its successor in interest, the City, can assert an easement for commerce, navigation and fishery over land which was part of a Mexican land grant and patented by the United States government pursuant to the Act of 1851. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 3:28 pm by Robert Vrana
Because infringement occurred “all over the United States, including Delaware . . . the claims arise in every judicial district. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 9:24 am
The United States Supreme Court stated in 1990 that the state has "a grave and legitimate interest" in stopping drunk drivers. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 10:43 am by Gregory Eisenreich
" Schwab's insertion of this waiver language followed the United States Supreme Court's decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 8:00 am
Sansone assists individuals file for bankruptcy protection under the United States Bankruptcy Code. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 8:19 am by Sheldon Toplitt
phonedog (Photo credit: Brad Weikel)In a 13-page complaint filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California alleging misappropriation of trade secrets, conversion and intentional interference with prospective economic advantage, a Delaware corporation based in Mt. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:47 am by Marissa Miller
University of Texas at Austin and the arguments in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 3:26 am by Russ Bensing
Most of the talk about SCOTUS last week centered on the oral argument in United States v. [read post]