Search for: "Wills v. State" Results 9461 - 9480 of 11,262
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2009, 5:14 am
If you're willing to pay, it's also on Westlaw, at 2009 WLNR 664485. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 2:50 pm by Howard Knopf
Here is the provision:Fair and equitable66.501 The Board shall fix royalty and levy rates and any related terms and conditions under this Act that are fair and equitable, in consideration of(a) what would have been agreed upon between a willing buyer and a willing seller acting in a competitive market with all relevant information, at arm’s length and free of external constraints;(b) the public interest;(c) any regulation made under subsection 66.91(1);… [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved  Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under a different name,… [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” Professor Tushnet spends a good amount of time examining the deconstruction of the administrative state (pp. 147-163). [read post]
District Court for the District of Columbia finally provided some guidance on this issue in UPMC Braddock v. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 12:10 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Intermediate v. strict scrutiny standard: but that’s one of the principal disputes right now. [read post]