Search for: "Billings v. United States"
Results 9481 - 9500
of 10,162
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2008, 2:53 am
John Cancalosi / www.ardea.com, available online The Ivory Billed Woodpecker (Campephilus principalis) (IBW) is the largest woodpecker in the United States and the second largest in the world. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 8:19 pm
In Yvonne Morales f/k/a Javier Morales v. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 12:15 pm
According to the statute: Any attorney appointed pursuant to this section or a bar association or legal aid agency or community defender organization which has provided the appointed attorney shall, at the conclusion of the representation or any segment thereof, be compensated at a rate not exceeding $ 60 per hour for time expended in court or before a United States magistrate [United States magistrate judge] and $ 40 per hour for time reasonably expended out of… [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 7:27 pm
There is an excellent description of the trial testimony to date in the Schroer case, now on trial before the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 4:00 am
blank">Bill of Rights. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 10:28 pm
In Tirado V. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 6:13 pm
The case is significant in that, for now, despite the long-standing rule to the contrary in the seminal United States Supreme Court case of Hanover Shoe v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 12:47 pm
This is a version of the argument from United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 12:32 am
Article I, Section 9 of the United States Constitution reads in part: "No bill, or attainder, or ex post facto law shall be passed. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 7:10 pm
Article I, Section 9 of the United States Constitution reads in part: "No bill, or attainder, or ex post facto law shall be passed. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 12:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 5:02 pm
United States District Court Judge James Robertson for the District of Columbia, issued an order in USA v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
Oliveira Ardor New York Senior Broker Associate 2 Gina Berger Lower East End Realty Brokerage - Commercial / Investment Sales 2 Ariel Toledano ant propeties inc Brokerage - Residential 3 Michael Xylas Xylas & Ziccardi, LLP Real Estate Attorney 3 Tracy Mehlman Marcus and Millichap Brokerage - Residential 3 David Hale 50 State Building Advisors Executive Vice President 3 Venecia DeSilva upscalecorp@yahoo.com investor 2 John Choi … [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 4:09 am
The United States Chamber of Commerce has come out in support of a bill, HR 6666. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 3:14 pm
Finally, in an effort to strengthen states’ abilities to address fraudulent or inappropriate marketing of plans, effective for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2009, MIPPA requires plans to: use only agents and brokers licensed under state law; abide by state appointment laws; report any agent terminations to the state; and comply with state requests for information regarding the performance of agents, brokers, and… [read post]
OH11: Judicial intergrity justifies exclusion; warrantless entry for noise complaint was unjustified
10 Aug 2008, 3:30 pm
State v. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 4:45 am
Boston Insulated Wire & Cable Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 6:13 pm
The case is significant in that, for now, despite the long-standing rule to the contrary in the seminal United States Supreme Court case of Hanover Shoe v. [read post]
