Search for: "CONVERSE v CONVERSE" Results 9481 - 9500 of 15,441
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2017, 5:42 am by Jordan Brunner
John Bellinger commented that the Alien Tort Statute case Doe v. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 4:24 am by Michael C. Dorf
If one's best analysis is that the court decided X v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 9:56 pm by Riana Harvey
Since no argument had been submitted to explain how use of the mark could affect the distinctiveness of the word ‘Basmati’, and namely, how distinctiveness would not be eroded (referring to the Taittinger decision again), damage was likely to occur.As such, the applicant’s plea was upheld and the Board of Appeal’s decision was annulled.CommentBrexit rears its head again, providing another talking point for conversation and raising the age-old question of when it will… [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:00 am by Harry Litman
Two unanimous Supreme Court decisions, United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2021, 1:29 pm by Ajay Sarma, Christiana Wayne
Kurup discussed the Supreme Court’s decision to hear United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 1:10 pm
Sorianello was not present for the raid, but in a telephone conversation with a local newspaper, he pointed out that "if I wanted to do something harmful or hack, I wouldn’t have told the company". [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 11:47 am by Reference Staff
”The most recent adoption of a Restatement section by the Washington Supreme Court was in Gerlach v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Unless a convention of the states assembled pursuant to Article V proceeds to ignore the language of Article V, the current structure of the Senate cannot be changed, and even permissible amendments will need the assent of 38 states. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 11:00 am by William Ford
Mattis, the Supreme Court’s per curiam opinion in U.S. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2018, 8:00 am by Mikhaila Fogel
Elena Chacko analyzed on the Israeli Supreme Court’s recent decision in Tabish v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 7:40 am by Afro-Buff
SNAPCHAT has argued that the type of invention relied on is not eligible for patent protection, in terms of the case of Alice v CLS Bank International (a 2014 US Supreme Court decision). [read post]