Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: T. S." Results 9481 - 9500 of 182,503
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2023, 4:41 pm by Florian Mueller
Obviously lawyers aren't economists or business administrators, but that entire litigation department's focus is on antitrust case, and antitrust is at the intersection of economics and law. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am by Eugene Volokh
"[8] Because of that, Congress could restrict such discrimination against military recruiters without violating the First Amendment.[9] "[I]f an individual announces that he intends to express his disapproval of the Internal Revenue Service by refusing to pay his income taxes," that announcement offers no basis for applying First Amendment scrutiny to the nonpayment of taxes.[10] Likewise, if a university announces that it is expressing disapproval of the military's… [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 9:05 am by Kevin LaCroix
Those prior circumstances are a reminder that financial crises don’t necessarily unfold rapidly. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 6:43 am by The Murray Law Firm
” According to the report, “[t]he man was taken to a hospital critically hurt, where he died due to his injuries. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
That test requires a court to find that a state's assertion of personal jurisdiction violates the Due Process Clause on the basis of a give factor balancing test, which refers to the defendant's interest, the plaintiff's interest, the interest of the forum, judicial efficiency and economy, and substantive policy concerns. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 3:59 am by SOQUIJ
En l’espèce, les intimés sont visés par une ordonnance à perpétuité en vertu de l’article 490.013 (2.1) C.Cr., et cette disposition a été déclarée inopérante par l’arrêt R. c. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 3:14 am by SHG
This isn’t because of racism or xenaphobia, but public interest. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
But don’t worry, unlike Pop [Joe], I won’t make you give me half your salary. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 11:12 pm by Frank Cranmer
Asked whether she trusted the decision, she replied: “That’s a really interesting question, isn’t it? [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review Staff
I’m often asked about my career path by those thinking of going into the government, and I answer but then say it’s different for everyone and often a product of timing, field of interest, and luck. [read post]
It does not “prohibi[t] a substantial amount of protected speech”—let alone enough to justify throwing out the law’s “plainly legitimate sweep. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 12:20 pm by Florian Mueller
If the question wasn't viewed as a partisan matter by Democrats, the FTC's behavior should be the subject of a Congressional investigation. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 8:00 am by AccelerateEditor
Don’t wait—take the first step towards obtaining the compensation you deserve. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 7:43 am by Russell Knight
“[T]here is no abatement upon the death of a party if the litigation has progressed to a point at which the merits of plaintiff’s allegations have been affirmatively determined. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Predominantly appeals to a prurient, shameful, or morbid interest; [2.] [read post]
In a comment following Putin’s address, the Wagner Group accused Putin of prioritizing the interests of Russia’s ultra-wealthy — himself apparently included — over the interests of Russia’s soldiers. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 3:38 am by harsh.sanghvi
These include the difficulty of your case, the lawyer’s experience, the firm’s reputation, and the particular fee arrangement used. [read post]