Search for: "JAMES V. STATE" Results 9481 - 9500 of 10,692
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2016, 3:09 pm by Francesca Procaccini
James Connell, Counsel for Ammar al Baluchi, stands to speak on this issue too. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 8:54 am by Eugene Volokh
To support application of the escape clause in this case, the Department relies heavily on the decision in Amin v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 9:19 pm by Transplanted Lawyer
Chambers: "Congress has been holding prayers for a long time, and James Madison wanted to do have prayers in Congress, so it must be okay for a legislature to have some kind of prayer. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:52 am by Rob Robinson
Georgetown Law Rolls Out the ‘Law Firm Pronunciation Guide - bit.ly/KoaqON (Bruce Carton) Global Aerospace Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 8:00 am by Jane Chong
Imagine the president granted a set of pardons to assist a foreign adversary in waging war against the United States. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:26 am
Archbold 4-447 (f) suggests that where asked a judge should offer an explanation: “a reasonable doubt is the sort of doubt that might affect the mind of the of a person in dealing with matters of importance in his own affairs” Walters v R. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” Professor Tushnet spends a good amount of time examining the deconstruction of the administrative state (pp. 147-163). [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 2:37 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  CTRL-C and CTRL-V are considered sacred symbols. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Indeed, as one federal court recently stated, “the ‘crypto’ nomenclature may be of recent vintage, but the challenged transactions fall comfortably within the framework that courts have used to identify securities for nearly eighty years. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 11:29 am
"It is unseemly -- to say the least -- that Kentucky may well kill [its condemned prisoners] using a drug that it would not permit to be used on their pets," Stevens said.The decision in Baze v. [read post]