Search for: "John Does, 1-2"
Results 9481 - 9500
of 10,076
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2008, 10:28 pm
Or does Senator McCain have the better argument, that history has moved on and today's greed is bad and should be punished or otherwise constrained? [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 1:59 am
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board reversed refusals to register the marks SUGAR NO. 1 1 , SUGAR NO. 14, and COTTON NO. 2, finding the marks not merely descriptive of "financial services, namely, futures exchange and related commodity trading services. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 10:47 am
County proposition 1 (technical change on election rules to save millions of dollars): Yes County proposition 2 (elect the county property assessor): No? [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 6:06 am
But if it does expire ... surveillance will not end, even if they stop us from extending the bill. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 6:06 am
But if it does expire ... surveillance will not end, even if they stop us from extending the bill. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 10:47 am
A. 06-222-JJF, 2006 WL 3091331, at *1- 2 (D.Del. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 10:15 am
John Q. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 4:28 am
The Board reversed an "ornamental" refusal to register the design mark shown below for vehicle tires, finding that the PTO Examining Attorney had failed to make a prima facie case that the mark is merely ornamental and does not function as a trademark (Sections 1, 2, and 45 of the Trademark Act). [read post]
27 Jan 2008, 9:51 am
Take the time to invent fresh, powerful images. 2. [read post]
27 Jan 2008, 4:24 am
Let's get that enforceable against John McCain and the other Republicans. 2. [read post]
26 Jan 2008, 11:23 am
But bringing a John Doe lawsuit would be expensive and time-consuming. [read post]
26 Jan 2008, 10:43 am
The decision recites, however, that at the hearing, the blogger limited his arguments to "two main points - (1) whether the [C&D] Letter is a copyrightable work; and (2) that the subpoena should be quashed at least with respect to the individual with the username ‘Tom Paine.' " (Decision at 3). [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 10:41 pm
1. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 6:26 pm
See the court decision: JOHN DOE -v- THE PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE; STATE POLICE COMMISSIONER JEFFREY B. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 4:19 pm
") at 2), that caused Jet financial losses. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 7:20 am
In this dubious decision, the Board found the mark GREEN BRANCH not to be merely descriptive of banking, financial, investment, and insurance services, and it therefore reversed the PTO's Section 2(e)(1) refusal to register. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 12:00 am
The steps in this stage are: (1) Data is received from the customer; (2) This data is culled and deduplicated; (3) The metadata is extracted; (4) The text is extracted; and (5) The document is TIFFed. [read post]
20 Jan 2008, 5:22 pm
(Posts in bold are the "must read" posts)1. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 2:06 pm
Whether you agree or disagree with the outcome, we can probably reach consensus on two points: (1) the outcome of the litigation was significant; and (2) the lawyer who pursued the case on Lance Sergeant Findlay's behalf performed brilliantly.Now that lawyer -- John Mackenzie -- is at it again. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 9:40 pm
John A. [read post]
