Search for: "M. B.1." Results 9481 - 9500 of 13,699
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2013, 9:20 am by Embajador Microjuris al Día
El diálogo se llevó a cabo en la misma Escuela y se centró en las experiencias de la activista como parte del Comité Amplio para la Búsqueda de la Equidad (CABE) que gestó el cabildeo a favor de los proyectos 437 y 488 (Ley Núm. 23 de 2013), de discrimen en el empleo y ley 54 respectivamente; y cuya voz fue vital para contrarrestar las fuerzas de grupos principalmente religiosos, que estaban en contra de su aprobación. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 4:24 am
Anonymous (May 30, 2009).Anonymous raises a really good point which, I'm afraid, won't work. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 6:39 am by Douglas
Da mesma forma se manifestaram os ministros Paulo de Tarso Sanseverino e Villas Bôas Cueva. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 3:00 am by Biglaw Investor
She has access to both a 401(k) and a 457(b) account. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:09 pm by sevach
B) Unas toneladas de papel de recursos administrativos y jurisdiccionales que perderán todo objeto ante el criterio del Tribunal Constitucional, y que pasarán a engrosar ese cementerio de pleitos “en vía muerta” y objeto de desguace, ante el portazo del Tribunal Constitucional a la cuestión. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 10:22 am by Ramiro Hernandez
Muchas personas tienen dudas por la próxima entrada en vigor de la VENTANILLA ELECTRONICA DE COMERCIO EXTERIOR (VUCEM), por lo que les presentamos un breve resumen con la información más relevante sobre este tema, para ser tomada en cuenta respecto su operación.1.- ¿Para qué sirve la VENTANILLA ELECTRONICA? [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 4:33 pm by Eugene Volokh
Note that I’m speaking in this post about what I think the right rules ought to be, not about what we should understand our Constitution to say with regard to this question.1. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 2:17 pm by Patricia Hughes
However, I’m limiting my comments to Bill 28’s use of the notwithstanding clause, to what I consider to be a realistic assessment of the impact of section 33 and to the federal government’s musings about what it can do. [read post]
29 May 2018, 3:26 am by Sander van Rijnswou
The grounds for the decision were published 26 March 2018.We usually only have  board of appeal decisions, but I'm told this is an important case as it relates to the CRISPR technique of DNA manipulation. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 8:45 am by Kashmir Hill
  I’ve dated a few law school guys and I’m ready for someone who’s a little less into weekly bar reviews – got any of those around? [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 9:46 am by Daniel Shaviro
  Reason 1, they can discourage the use of resident companies to invest either at home or abroad. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 10:56 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Patenting and 1% inequality are correlated including geographically. [read post]