Search for: "Mark"
Results 9481 - 9500
of 151,857
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2023, 4:59 am
On its ESTTA cover sheet, opposer listed pending applications for all three marks, as well as common law rights in the mark STERLING COMPUTERS. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 8:19 am
If firms want the only mark, but settle for a few marks in non-overlapping goods and services, I'm hard pressed to see how allowing even more firms to use the same mark will help generate distinctiveness. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 4:17 am
The Board acknowledged that the word PAY at the trailing end of ZT's mark somewhat distinguishes the marks visually and aurally. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 6:42 am
" The Badge Mark: Unsurprisingly, as to applicant's other mark, the "Badge Mark," the same analysis applied. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 1:30 am
For the Article to apply the mark applied for has to be identical or similar for identical or similar goods/services to the third-party mark being 'copied'. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 3:52 am
The extra X in applicant's mark is not likely to be noticed by consumers. [read post]
28 Sep 2013, 11:33 pm
This Kat asks: is Mo Pho infringing Pho Holdings Ltd's trade marks? [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:26 am
Their descriptions of the mark varied and the lack of clarity regarding the mark undermined the persuasiveness of the declarations. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 3:04 am
"Use of a mark means the bona fide use of such mark made in the ordinary course of trade, and not merely to reserve a right in a mark. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 1:30 am
For the Article to apply the mark applied for has to be identical or similar for identical or similar goods/services to the third-party mark being 'copied'. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 5:58 am
BTW: How did this mark get past the examining attorney? [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 3:43 am
" Color was not claimed as a feature of the mark. [read post]
Precedential No. 12: Finding Clothing and Books Related, TTAB Sustains 2(d) Opposition to ENGIRLNEER
16 Mar 2020, 4:09 am
The Board found that opposer had established prior rights in the mark ENGIRLNEER,Likelihood of Confusion: Of course, since the involved marks are identical, a lesser degree of similarity between the goods/services is needed to support a finding of likely confusion. [read post]
31 May 2016, 6:23 am
The senior mark was being confused with the (better-known) junior one. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 7:41 am
"The Marks: The Board agreed with Examining Attorney Angela Duong that the word LOGGERHEAD is the dominant element of all of the marks. [read post]
8 May 2014, 3:45 am
Since the marks were similar and their respective goods identical, likelihood of confusion was the result. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 3:15 am
The Board agreed that the marks must be viewed in their entireties. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 4:58 am
The person or institution named by the mark is not connected with the activities performed by the applicant under the mark; and4. [read post]
13 May 2019, 2:28 am
In particular, it considered that the two marks would be similar since they shared the same element “SPA” and that the repute of the “SPA” trade mark in Brussels for mineral and aerated waters had been proven.Furthermore, the public would establish a ‘link’ between the two signs because of:the element “SPA”, which is a distinctive component in the trade mark applied for: the name ‘VICHY’ has little distinctive… [read post]
15 May 2024, 2:15 am
Trade marks that merely describe the characteristics of a product, such as its ingredients or nature, generally lack distinctiveness and may not benefit of trade mark protection. [read post]
