Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 9481 - 9500
of 13,837
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2012, 11:02 am
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 9:47 am
A.C. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 3:34 pm
Rptr. 331 (1988) ("At issue on this appeal is whether, by virtue of the so-called California Tidelands Trust Doctrine, the State and its successor in interest, the City, can assert an easement for commerce, navigation and fishery over land which was part of a Mexican land grant and patented by the United States government pursuant to the Act of 1851. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 3:28 pm
Because infringement occurred “all over the United States, including Delaware . . . the claims arise in every judicial district. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 9:24 am
The United States Supreme Court stated in 1990 that the state has "a grave and legitimate interest" in stopping drunk drivers. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 10:43 am
" Schwab's insertion of this waiver language followed the United States Supreme Court's decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 8:00 am
Sansone assists individuals file for bankruptcy protection under the United States Bankruptcy Code. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:03 am
by Dennis Crouch EveryMD v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 2:00 am
In Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 8:43 am
by Dennis Crouch EveryMD v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 8:19 am
phonedog (Photo credit: Brad Weikel)In a 13-page complaint filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California alleging misappropriation of trade secrets, conversion and intentional interference with prospective economic advantage, a Delaware corporation based in Mt. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:47 am
University of Texas at Austin and the arguments in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 3:26 am
Most of the talk about SCOTUS last week centered on the oral argument in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 3:09 am
Spanish speakers constitute more that 12 percent of the United States population. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 7:04 pm
While United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 11:44 am
“Under the majority’s test,” Justice Sotomayor wrote, “four wrongs apparently make a right.” Conclusion In largely sidestepping the second, broader question on which certiorari was granted – whether Malley and its exclusionary-rule corollary, United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 11:16 am
Prior to the final approval of the Massachusetts settlement, Skilstaf filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 6:54 am
Discussing oral argument in United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 5:00 am
Jan. 6, 2012), the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, partially dismissed a derivative action brought against PICO Holdings, Inc. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 5:12 pm
Golinski is employed as staff attorney in the Motions Unit of the Office of Staff Attorneys in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
