Search for: "United States v. Good" Results 9481 - 9500 of 21,069
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2019, 7:00 am by Andrew Hamm
United States 19-361Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on a cert-stage amicus brief in support of the petitioners in this case. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:15 am by John Elwood
§ 841(a)(l) as defined in United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 2:04 pm by Sandy Levinson
 With respect, try telling that first to Eugene V. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 9:54 am by William S. Dodge
Arthur Anderson & Co.); and (3) that acts of Congress should presumptively apply to conduct occurring within or having effects within the United States (Judge Mikva’s view in Environmental Defense Fund v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 1:11 am by Ken Lammers
United States - If police acted in good faith, pursuant to legal precedent, in executing a search, must the fruit of the search be excluded if precedent changes to make the search unconstitutional? [read post]
20 May 2015, 1:40 pm
United States of America, Docket Number 14-12814 Decided April 21, 2015; The Court held that a conviction in Florida for Uttering a Forged Instrument, in violation of Fla. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 6:38 am by Matt Tait
It didn’t take long after Trump’s unexpected election as the 45th president of the United States for the encryption debate to reemerge. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:25 am
The Slater v Condappa case - see above. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 11:30 am by Michael O'Hear
I had not seen this dimension addressed in an appellate decision before, but the Seventh Circuit did so last week in United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:00 am by John Ehrett
United States 14-1121Issue: (1) Whether a foreign seller's conduct can “involv[e] *** import trade or import commerce” even when the seller himself does not import any goods into the United States; (2) whether a foreign price-fixing agreement can have an effect on U.S. commerce that is “direct” and “gives rise to” a Sherman Act claim even when the agreement fixes prices only in foreign sales; and (3) whether… [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 8:24 am by annalthouse@gmail.com (Ann Althouse)
Oregon, where Roberts would have let the United States attorney general keep doctors from prescribing the suicide drugs that were authorized by Oregon law. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
Merely stating the seemingly obvious--that the unit of analysis is “the case”--does not solve all problems. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 3:54 pm by Tobias Thienel
In a separate set of proceedings instituted by Yugoslavia against all the member States of NATO relating to the Kosovo air campaign, the Court firmly stated in December 2004 that Yugoslavia had not been a member of the United Nations, that it had therefore not enjoyed a right of access to the Court, and that the Court was therefore not competent to deal with the case (Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. [read post]