Search for: "BES v. State"
Results 9501 - 9520
of 68,875
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2015, 4:00 am
The defendant relied on the judgment of Lord Dyson in the Supreme Court case of R (Lumba) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2012] 1 AC 245 [101]), in which he disapproved the concept of “vindicatory damages”. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 3:32 pm
From questioning today in King v. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 9:32 am
On 6 October 2023, the English Court of Appeal (Court of Appeal) handed down its judgment in Mints v PJSC National Bank Trust [2023] EWCA Civ 1132. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 2:17 pm
In Safford v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 3:45 am
I pride myself on being a pro-feminist sort of guy; hell, I’m so sensitive I make Alan Alda look like Vlad the Impaler. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 2:33 pm
In United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 4:54 pm
[An overlooked part of United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 3:37 pm
As Ethan recaps and as Paul Ohm indicated (United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 7:00 pm
The Labour Relations Board in Ontario was recently asked to take a broad view of the definition of workplace in Hydro One Networks Inc. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 12:27 am
US v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 1:32 pm
The state's taking away someone's liberty, so we want to make sure we're doing the right thing. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 7:25 am
Supreme Court case of Oil States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 6:47 am
In Desrosiers v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 10:21 am
Under Youngstown v. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 7:36 am
Joint Employment In Jinks v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
After dealing briefly with the facts and the judicial history she then summarised the principles applicable to “defamation in the civil law” (the case being an appeal from Quebec Court of Appeal which applies principles derived from old French law). [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 12:49 pm
In the case, State v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 12:49 pm
Peck, Andrew Peck, Class Action, Computer-assisted review, Da Silva Moore v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:04 am
Following on Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 [Our report] and Lord Jackson’s view on JR costs, the Court of Appeal in M v London Borough of Croydon [2012] EWCA Civ 595 has given general guidance for awarding costs. [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:04 am
Following on Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 [Our report] and Lord Jackson’s view on JR costs, the Court of Appeal in M v London Borough of Croydon [2012] EWCA Civ 595 has given general guidance for awarding costs. [read post]
