Search for: "Bui v. State" Results 9501 - 9520 of 9,832
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2007, 1:57 am
  I'm not sure I fully buy it, but it's a good argument.That first dependent clause in the paragraph excerpted above, however, is somewhat of a non sequitur -- "aside from being factually wrong. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 12:50 pm
Roe v Wade's trimester is one good example, and its stability became an open question after years of apparent precedential force. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 8:16 pm
" [1] There have been similar moves taken by Steinbröck's counterparts in the States. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 11:06 am
Monika Büning, Federation of German Consumer Organizations, presented "Buying nano: What consumers want to know. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 2:17 am
The dust is starting to settle in the widely publicised case of Bragg v. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 1:25 am
Santos Subscription Required NASSAU COUNTYContracts Agreements to Buy Out Former Partner Suspended From Practicing Law Not Void, Against Public Policy Glickenhouse v. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 10:44 am
The Court on Sept. 25 agreed to rule on the case of Baze v. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 1:01 am
Supreme Court in 2005 upended the federal sentencing guidelines in United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 12:51 am by Sean Hayes
REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT (Amended as of January 14, 2005)(New Law in effect on Oct, 2007)CHAPTER I GENERAL PROVISIONS Article 1 (Purpose) The purpose of this Act is to contribute to the development of national economy by prescribing the matters concerning the establishment of a real estate investment company, the management methods of assets thereof and the protection of investors therein to provide citizens at large with more opportunities to invest in the real estate as well as to… [read post]