Search for: "CONVERSE v CONVERSE" Results 9501 - 9520 of 15,441
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2017, 12:49 pm by Florian Mueller
I had a brief conversation with a senior German judge who wasn't personally presiding over the German Motorola v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 2:57 pm by William Appleton
  Peter Marguiles analyzed the Fifth Circuit’s Oct. 5 ruling in Texas v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 10:58 am by William Ford
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 12:19 am by Florian Mueller
Daimler brought its EU antitrust complaint against Nokia in 2018, and the Euporean Commission is still dragging its feet while another court decision (Nokia v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 11:00 am
Since the Singapore Court of Appeal’s decision in Staywell Hospitality Group Pty Ltd v Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc [2014] 1 SLR 911, the comparison of trade marks in Singapore has invariably involved the question of technical distinctiveness.Technical distinctivness refers to the capacity of a trade mark to operate as a badge of origin. [read post]
28 May 2018, 1:18 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
Conversely, a spouse and other relatives who, in effect, are “on-call,” can be compensated even though they are doing other household chores. [read post]
28 May 2018, 1:18 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
Conversely, a spouse and other relatives who, in effect, are “on-call,” can be compensated even though they are doing other household chores. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 5:06 pm by Giles Peaker
Armes v Wheel Property Co Ltd, Clerkenwell and Shoreditch County Court, 17 May 2013 Claimant had been the protected tenant of a two bed flat in a Victorian terrace conversion for 30 years. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 11:13 am by Glenn
Conversely, since the basic criticism by Google’s opponents is that so-called “demoting” of search links for would-be vertical rivals is deceptive — whether or not it is the “evil” Google’s founders initially pledged not to do — a Section 5 case premised on lack of disclosure might have some legs. [read post]