Search for: "Chief Justice of the United States" Results 9501 - 9520 of 14,935
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2013, 10:59 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Both this seemingly ad hoc decision-making process and the interference with adequate representation it was meant to settle are two of the many reasons that the ACLU continues to oppose the United States' use of military commissions to try military detainees and to call for the close of the Guantánamo detention facility. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 4:15 am by Howard Friedman
 Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution provides that "[t]he President shall be the Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States ... " It would seem to follow, therefore, that the President of the United States, as Commander-in-Chief, has the authority-- and power-- to directly address the issue of force-feeding of the detainees at Guantanamo Bay.AP reports on the decision. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 3:56 am by Legal Beagle
They fear that it has given state and public authorities encouragement to hide information that should be public property. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:01 am by Jack Chin
I think the critique of legal scholarship overall, especially from someone like the Chief Justice, is made partially in jest. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 11:11 am by Ronald Collins
Readers are also alerted to the important role played by state judges (such as Margaret Marshall, as the Chief Justice of the highest court in Massachusetts) and state lawmakers (for example, in Vermont and Washington). [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 9:46 am by Federalist Society
In an opinion delivered by Chief Justice Roberts, the Court held by a vote of 5-4 that Section 4 of the Voting Rights act is unconstitutional, and therefore cannot be used to subject jurisdictions to preclearance requirements. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 9:46 am by Federalist Society
In an opinion delivered by Chief Justice Roberts, the Court held by a vote of 5-4 that Section 4 of the Voting Rights act is unconstitutional, and therefore cannot be used to subject jurisdictions to preclearance requirements. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 9:04 am by Lyle Denniston
  All judges who sit temporarily on that court and pass upon government intelligence surveillance requests are named by Chief Justice John G. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 4:34 am by Florian Mueller
Finally, to the extent that the Commission majority's analysis herein is otherwise inconsistent with the analysis in his dissenting views, he affirms the analysis in his dissenting views.And here's the full text of the public redacted version of his dissenting statement:PUBLIC VERSIONDISSENTING VIEWS OF COMMISSIONER PINKERT ONTHE COMMISSION'S ISSUANCE OFAN EXCLUSION ORDER AND A CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDERAlthough I concur with my colleagues on all issues related to claim construction, infringement, and… [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 2:46 pm by Ron Coleman
  Professor McCarthy calls the decision a “great embarrassment” for the United States. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 10:11 am by Rekha Arulanantham
Let’s be clear:  Any member of Congress who votes to give state and local police the power to do immigration enforcement is voting to open the door to widespread racial profiling and illegal detentions throughout the United States. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 8:25 am by Larry Catá Backer
As such, it is no different from numerous such conflicts all over the world, where host states, eager for the returns of foreign direct investment and following the mantra of sustainable development, seek to develop their own resources in accordance with host state environmental and developmental policies.[2] In so doing, governments and corporations sometimes find themselves confronted by communities who, while engaging in local resistance, share the common language of the global… [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:07 am by Susan Brenner
Illinois . . . limits use of LEADS to criminal justice purposes. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 10:18 am by Rodger Citron
  (All the Chief Justice said in the last part of his decision was that claims under the ATS must “touch and concern the territory of the United States” with “sufficient force to displace the presumption. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 6:42 am by Dan Stein
United States for the American Bar Association. [read post]