Search for: "Court v. State" Results 9501 - 9520 of 208,278
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2014, 8:39 am by Peter Thompson & Associates
Austin, Oct. 1, 2013, Androscoggin Superior Court More Blog Entries: Strout v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 1:27 pm by WIMS
      The Appeals Court said, "Having reviewed the dismissal de novo, assuming that the facts stated in the complaint are true, Lambeth v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 4:36 pm
Virginia, 443 U.S. 319 (1979), since 15 October 2002, when Judge Erdmann joined the court. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 10:38 am by John M. Rogitz
The respondent immediately takes issue with the argument that patents are not public rights, summarily citing MCM Portfolio LLC v. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 7:41 am by John Floyd
This case vividly illustrates the far-reaching divisions among federal and state courts about dealing with Bruton Rule-type cases since the Supreme Court decided Crawford v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 7:44 am by Immigration Prof
In Department of State v/ Munoz, the Supreme Court today held that a citizen does not have a fundamental liberty interest in her noncitizen spouse being admitted to the country. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 8:05 am by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
Based on California state law, the trial court granted the plaintiff’s motion, finding that the law required the court to protect the plaintiff’s right to be heard. [read post]
2 Jun 2025, 7:06 am by Derek Muller
Several states, including Illinois, have enacted… Continue reading The post Supreme Court grants certiorari in Bost v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 11:19 am by Viking
WHETHER AN ARTICLE 134 CLAUSE 1 OR 2 SPECIFICATION THAT FAILS TO EXPRESSLY ALLEGE EITHER POTENTIAL TERMINAL ELEMENT STATES AN OFFENSE UNDER THE SUPREME COURT’S HOLDINGS IN UNITED STATES v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 5:37 pm
Although New York's highest court, the New York Court of Appeals, found there was no state constitutional right to same-sex marriage, Hernandez v. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 10:01 pm by rhapsodyinbooks
The Supreme Court took up the case of whether the city violated the Fifth Amendment’s takings clause in Kelo v. [read post]