Search for: "DOE DEFENDANT"
Results 9501 - 9520
of 112,778
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2018, 8:11 am
The court does agree with the last argument, that Mr. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 4:09 pm
Murdock agreed to pay the settlement amount on the defendants’ behalf. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 7:12 am
LEXIS 982 (November 14, 2007)* (probably will be unpublished, but the opinion does not say; decided by one appellate judge). [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 2:24 pm
In this case, I find that the complaint does not sufficiently state facts from which I can infer intent. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 9:23 am
In plain English: if the defendant does what he or she is supposed to do in prison, he or she would be released from prison to post-release supervision after 4 months. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 9:23 am
In plain English: if the defendant does what he or she is supposed to do in prison, he or she would be released from prison to post-release supervision after 4 months. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 3:11 am
The Court rejected this argument, finding that plaintiffs had presented no proof that defendant knew the cabin had been left exposed to the elements, ruling that “[w]hat may be common knowledge in a community does not demonstrate [defendant’s] actual notice or knowledge on this issue. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 1:40 pm
A sentencing judge can, and frequently does, order the defendant to pay restitution as compensation for any monetary losses sustained by the victim. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 4:44 am
The Court of Appeals simply wrote: "Plaintiff's legal malpractice claim was not brought within the applicable statute of limitations period, and defendants-appellants established as a matter of law that the continuous representation doctrine does not apply. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 6:57 am
So how does the prosecution prove what the BAC was when the defendant was driving? [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 7:38 am
A photo may be worth a thousand words, but that does not mean its clear and convincing evidence. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 9:08 pm
The civil action also names John Does 1-3 to eventually rope in defendants “whose identifies and citizenship are presently unkown,” but who “were involved in the manufacture, distribution, and/or sales that caused Plaintiffs’ associated injuries. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 2:15 am
Some think the decision does little to alter the current judicial landscape in which defendants struggle to prove that a prosecutor exercised her peremptory challenge because of a juror's race (this is due, in large part, to the fact that almost any race neutral reason offered by the prosecutor for striking a juror is accepted by the court.)They state that: "the Court's decision appeared to be a straightforward application of the 1986 decision in Batson v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 5:30 am
Defendant moves to stay proceedings pending arbitration. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 7:20 am
Depending on how this law is to be interpreted, it could have very peculiar consequences.Section 459(b) does not explicitly presume that charges are being filed before the subsection applies. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 12:30 pm
“What does the Guardian Ad Litem do in the context like this, different from what we have? [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 11:41 am
Or does it? [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 11:13 am
Unclean hands “requires balancing the alleged wrongdoing of the plaintiff against that of the defendant,” and the district court did that. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 11:58 am
In addition, the Family Trust does not contain a specific promise by the defendant to pay a sum of money to the plaintiff. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 1:11 pm
It is said that the deposit of a work in the Register of the Russian Authors' Society does not in itself confirm the right of authorship and does not constitute a guarantee of authorship. [read post]
