Search for: "FAIR v. THE STATE"
Results 9501 - 9520
of 30,503
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2012, 6:33 am
At Reason, Jacob Sullum discusses the questions about the constitutionality of warrantless electronic surveillance left open by United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 6:51 am
On February 12, 2015, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals decided Sundberg v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 4:45 am
Such is the state of the NL backlog that I’m only getting to it now. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 4:45 am
Such is the state of the NL backlog that I’m only getting to it now. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 1:25 pm
" After a hearing, the State Board revoked the doctor's license.While the doctor raised an array of technical objections by way of an Article 78 proceeding, the Appellate Division, Third Department, ultimately concluded that the penalty did not "shock one's sense of fairness" and left the revocation undisturbed.Frankly, it would have been shocking if the AD3 had concluded otherwise.For a copy of… [read post]
28 Jul 2006, 12:40 pm
The case is Equal Rights Center v. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 1:58 pm
According to the 1993 South Dakota Supreme Court decision, State v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:51 am
BM v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 366 (05 April 2011) - Read judgment Another control order has been ruled unlawful and quashed by the court of appeal, on the basis that the evidence relied upon to impose it was “too vague and speculative”. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 10:36 am
In Atkins v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 6:44 pm
Ruling unanimously in Densmaa v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 6:10 am
Friedman offers the explanation that justices fear being overruled by Congress, as happened this year when Congress passed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act to undo the Court’s ruling in Ledbetter v. [read post]
27 May 2022, 8:19 am
The Case of Hughes v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 1:58 pm
Staples v. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 12:08 pm
Thorogood v. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 9:09 am
In United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:45 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court accepted one more case for next term, Oil States Energy Services LLC v. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 7:46 am
” The plaintiffs, one former and one current hhGregg employee, brought a collective action on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated current and former employees, alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) and state law. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 7:46 am
” The plaintiffs, one former and one current hhGregg employee, brought a collective action on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated current and former employees, alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) and state law. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 3:19 pm
SEC v. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 1:01 pm
For example, in Castle v. [read post]
