Search for: "HARMS v. HARMS"
Results 9501 - 9520
of 36,797
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2013, 5:35 pm
The petition of the day is: Octane Fitness v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 7:26 pm
The petition of the day is: Mullenix v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 12:15 am
Practice point: The owner of a public establishment has no duty to protect patrons against unforeseeable and unexpected assaults.Student note: While landowners in general have a duty to act in a reasonable manner to prevent harm to those on their property, an owner's duty to control the conduct of persons on its premises arises only when it has the opportunity to control such persons and is reasonably aware of the need for such control.Case: Afanador v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 6:51 am
Valentine v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 12:14 am
Practice point: The manner in which a police officer operates his or her vehicle in an emergency situation may not form the basis for civil liability to an injured third party unless the officer acted in reckless disregard for the safety of others.Student note: The reckless disregard' standard requires proof that the officer intentionally committed an act of an unreasonable character in disregard of a known or obvious risk that was so great as to make it highly probable that harm would… [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:21 pm
Although the girl was not harmed, OATH Administrative Law Judge Joan R. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 1:54 pm
Doe v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm
A law which confers a discretion is not in itself inconsistent with this requirement, provided the scope of the discretion and the manner of its exercise are indicated with sufficient clarity to give the individual protection against interference which is arbitrary: Goodwin v United Kingdom (1996) 22 EHRR 123 , para 31; Sorvisto v Finland , para 112. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 8:40 am
”) Bowman v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 2:00 am
Donnell v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 5:28 pm
Gill v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 3:49 am
e360Insight, LLC v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 12:25 pm
In Neissel v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 3:00 pm
" The SJC cites its own 2006 decision in Standerwick v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 2:57 pm
(Rafael Henrique | Dreamstime.com)In today's ruling in Murthy v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 3:32 am
The insurers’ claims against the Bank for damages for misrepresentation were matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict under article 7(2) of the Regulation with the “harmful event” occurring in England. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
Pierre v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 8:41 am
Case citation: LabMD v. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 10:00 am
Case citation: State v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 11:00 am
04/21/09 Mirror of Justice Blog:"Here are a couple of letters to the speaker of the Connecticut house arguing for meaningful religious liberty exemptions in the bill [to implement the state supreme court's October 2008 decision in Kerrigan v. [read post]
