Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: T. S."
Results 9501 - 9520
of 182,503
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2010, 5:44 pm
It's well worth a read. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 5:04 pm
To repeat the old adage “you couldn’t make it up. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 3:54 pm
I don't know what's going on, I just nod when people talk about it. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 9:40 am
Ain't it the truth! [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
I guess I would conceptually think of strict scrutiny, narrow tailoring, compelling interest as coming at the back end to say yes, maybe in the ordinary case, the government shouldn't have been permitted to undertake the kind of suppression of free speech that it did, but in this unique circumstance it actually had a compelling interest, and it used narrowly tailored means to accomplish that issue. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 4:41 am
A songwriter doesn't share lucrative touring revenue and they don't do brand deals. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 11:42 am
His column, "Relist (and hold) watch," would ordinarily be about as interesting as its title, at least to people who aren't Supreme Court specialists. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 7:38 am
No vested interest here. [read post]
16 Sep 2023, 7:59 am
They are openly laughing at someone's interest in history. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 2:55 pm
Eric Posner has an interesting post up at VC on the optimal size of countries. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 11:56 pm
I can't decide where to place this on a continuum between self-satisfied solipsism and really kind of interesting--this description of how they work at Talking Points Memo, Josh Marshall's primo blog, or rather blog network (link): Explaining how TPM works can be daunting, especially if you're describing it to someone from a traditional journalism background or, say, older relatives for whom something as simple as email is still intimidating. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 6:40 am
As Corona foreclosure defense lawyers, we've believed for a long time that lenders aren't interested in having their loan modification practices exposed to the light of day. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 9:35 am
And the restriction isn’t narrowly tailored to some compelling government interest. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 3:30 am
– A 21-page letter arguing that the proposed rules don’t violate the First Amendment from a group of 6 law professors led by Harvard Law School’s Rebecca Tushnet. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
This year’s survey says that SOX compliance hasn’t been immune to the Pandora’s Box of market disruptions we’ve experienced over the past two years. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 8:04 am
(Orin Kerr) Jess Bravin of the Wall Street Journal has a very interesting article on the dispute among two plaintiff’s attorneys involved in Florence v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 5:24 pm
That test isn’t traditionally the sort of thing that can be satisfied by the government’s bare say-so. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 3:54 pm
Whilst I'm sure this is hardly interesting news to most people (as likely you won't care or have already read it), I thought I might as well occasionally blog my thoughts on the book. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 10:10 am
Lowell, Leigh T. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 7:46 am
The court also endorsed initial interest confusion, at least when the confusion is only remedied by further research (as opposed to being immediately dispelled). [read post]
