Search for: "In Re L."
Results 9501 - 9520
of 22,401
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2015, 10:30 am
L’exercice prend du temps et après l’enthousiasme des premières années, le réflexe s’estompe; l’envie s’évapore. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
Il y donc lieu, à son avis, « […] de déterminer si l’appelant a agi de manière à porter atteinte à l’autorité ou à la dignité du tribunal ». [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 1:33 pm
I recently re-read one of my favorite childhood books, Karen by Marie Killilea. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 11:00 am
Opinion 2/13 on the EU's Accession to the European Convention on Human RightsRachel López, The (Re)collection of Memory After Mass Atrocity and the Dilemma for Transitional Justice [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 7:25 am
Inc. is represented by Michael L. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
By Matthew Garza, J.D.Chief Justice Leo Strine put to rest a dispute over the makeup of the board of two closely related technology companies after finding that the Delaware Chancery Court properly used new “clean up” provisions in the Delaware General Corporation Law (DGCL) to validate improperly issued stock (In re Numoda Corporation, October 22, 2015, Strine, L.)The case involved three siblings, John Boris, Ann Boris, and Mary Schaheen, who founded and controlled… [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 9:11 am
NLRB, 14-3284(L) (2d Cir. [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
La mère ne possède aucun droit réel sur celui-ci ni sur son contenu. [read post]
24 Oct 2015, 12:25 pm
[L]et me tell you...what happened in this particular event. ... [read post]
24 Oct 2015, 10:16 am
We're just going to have to continue to evaluate each case according to its particular circumstances. [read post]
24 Oct 2015, 7:01 am
More recently we have Deborah L. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm
A brief review of the justifications usually given for the exclusions for marks that are scandalous or disparaging: (1) the harm done by the government endorsement represented by a registration; (2) the desire to withhold government resources from disparaging or scandalous terms; (3) the lack of any effect on a user’s ability or right to use the mark, with (a) possible §43(a) or state common law protection against confusing uses despite unregistrability, though this is not at all… [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 4:26 am
’ In re Victor L. supra. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 3:43 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 3:38 pm
See In re Coors Brewing Co., 343 F.3d 1340 (Fed. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 10:37 am
L. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 8:42 am
We’re frankly not surprised that something like this has happened. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 7:22 am
“I have members that have been retired for over 20 years, and now they’re being asked to take a reduction in their health insurance or pay more for it? [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 3:34 am
In re Richard J. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 9:30 pm
Elle met en lumière le drame d’une Révolution française qui, par défiance de la justice comme pouvoir, ne sut pas ériger de juges en tiers garant de ces droits. [read post]
