Search for: "John Thomas" Results 9501 - 9520 of 10,953
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Big Tech Sweeps Up Hill Staffers – Just When Congress Needs Them the Most MSN – Emily Birnbaum and John Hendel (Politico) | Published: 10/12/2021 Silicon Valley and the telecommunications industry are snatching up some of the top Democratic policy experts on Capitol Hill just as Congress gears up for fights with the companies. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
In today’s increasingly fraught public realm, Lord Thomas’s sombre warning takes on even greater and more urgent resonance. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 12:20 am by Jeff Gamso
  In that limited way, it's close to the balls and strikes model that John Roberts foolishly endorsed at his confirmation hearings and that all who've come after him (Alito, Kagan, Sotomayor) claim to endorse, though none of those Justices claim to be textualists or originalists. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 1:29 pm by Amy Howe
This continues through (in order of seniority) Justice Clarence Thomas, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Justice Stephen Breyer (who sits next to Justice Thomas and often has animated conversations with him), and Justice Sonia Sotomayor, until you get to Justice Elena Kagan, the Court’s junior Justice. [read post]
2 May 2022, 4:36 pm by Jeffrey Rosen
His prediction came to a head in the controversy of the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798, where the Federalist Congress made it a crime to criticize the Federalist President, John Adams, but not the Republican Vice President, Thomas Jefferson. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:32 pm by Mark Walsh
When the justices take the bench, Chief Justice John Roberts proceeds with the recently restored practice of in-courtroom bar admissions. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by Monika U. Ehrman
In this case, petitioner John Rapanos argued that the CWA did not apply to wetlands that were not immediately adjacent to navigable waters. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 1:44 pm by Jeff Gamso
I was going to give you that string of quotes and then doubt whether the collective wisdom of the media, that Maples will win either 8-1 or 7-2 (Scalia dissenting or maybe Scalia & Thomas), bears any actual relationship to reality.Oh, it might. [read post]