Search for: "Mark Cover" Results 9501 - 9520 of 18,230
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2014, 10:57 am by Jon Robinson
Yates Brief of Respondent, United States Reply of Petitioner, John Yates Mark Walsh, Fisherman convicted of violating Sarbanes-Oxley will be heard by the Supreme Court (published by the American Bar Association) Tip of the hat to the NACDL, SCOTUSblog, and the ABA Journal. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 11:24 am by Lloyd J. Jassin
., Chicken Soup for the Soul®), approval and ownership of the title – which also functions as a service mark – becomes a critical issue. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 9:30 am by azatty
The First Amendment Coalition of Arizona event was introduced by journo and educator Mark Scarp (Mark is also the Past President of the Society of Professional Journalists Valley of the Sun Chapter). [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 9:30 am by azatty
The First Amendment Coalition of Arizona event was introduced by journo and educator Mark Scarp (Mark is also the Past President of the Society of Professional Journalists Valley of the Sun Chapter). [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 8:47 am
Designs are usually easy and cheap to register when compared with trade marks, he reminded us, and you don't lose them through non-use. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 7:07 am
 The notice marks the first time the FAA has sought to criminalize the use of drones and model planes, attorneys representing drone users said. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 4:00 am by Bob Berring
Marking events and stopping to consider what they portend remains a good idea, as does a sense of history and of the long horizon of the future. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 1:14 am by Tessa Shepperson
Here is a (rather long) question to the blog clinic from Mark (not his real name) who is a landlord. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 6:40 am by Benjamin Wittes
“In the past, mail covers were used when you had a reason to suspect someone of a crime,” said Mark D. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 6:22 am
 Consequently, the holder of an earlier right may apply to invalidate a trade mark, unless the latter was filed in good faith or was used as a trade mark for more than five years (Articles L. 711-1 - L. 711-4 IPC) — these being the national provisions relied upon in this case. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 4:36 am by Jon Gelman
The top five are rounded out by New Jersey ($2.82), New York ($2.75) and Alaska ($2.68).Ranking lowest was North Dakota, where a mere 88 cents of every $100 in payroll goes toward workers' comp costs.Scott Bridges has covered the Los Angeles scene for over ten years as a journalist and food critic. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 10:46 am by Benjamin Bissell
The BBC reports that the full party-list results are expected later tonight, and will cover “only 225 of the 450 seats. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 10:40 am
Here are some of the better ones:From Mark Anderson (Anderson Law, and superb fellow blogger for IP Draughts) came this:A talented kitten called KateBought brands very cheap in KuwaitWhen she got back to BlightyCustoms men got exciteyAnd impounded her counterfeit freight. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 8:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  The agreement didn’t say anything about LivingSocial’s rights or obligations with respect to ATYS’s mark. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 2:15 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
That’s probably a welcome relief to Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg and his wife, Dr. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Those test subjects with more experience buying consumers or more education were more likely to be confused—cuts against judicial doctrine.Secondary meaning survey: created fictitious marks with no secondary meaning and mimicked typical trademark use on products—Chocolate Abundance, Party Hat, Fudge Covered Cookies etc. for chocolate covered cookies. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 8:56 am
  MPLA’s comments should be taken as those of pipeline landowners across Canada.This marks the third time that MPLA has written to the NEB concerning the most recent round of proposed changes to Pipeline Crossing Regulations. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 3:07 am
Drake Law School Professor Mark Kende has posted a response to my critique of his argument that Justice Clarence Thomas supports the Supreme Court’s infamous decision in Korematsu v. [read post]