Search for: "Marks v. State " Results 9501 - 9520 of 21,692
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2015, 5:41 am by Amy Howe
In a number of cases out of Ohio, the perennial battleground state in presidential elections, the Sixth Circuit has found lack of uniform rules in the state to raise Bush v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 4:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 at 50 [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Dombrowski v Bulson, 19 NY3d 347, 350 [2012]; AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 434 [2007]). [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 2:45 am
The European Court of Justice has given its ruling this morning in Case C-239/05 BVBA Management, Training en Consultancy v Benelux-Merkenbureau, a reference from the Brussels Court of Appeal for a preliminary ruling on several issues of European trade mark law. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 9:49 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
  The Court also noted that ICANN had stated that UDRP procedures are particularly suited to “abusive registration” cases, and not to legitimate trade mark or trade name disputes which are relegated by the UDRP Rules to the courts. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
Mark Walsh reports for Education Week’s School Law Blog that “state courts of last resort have split on whether the sentencer—either a judge or jury, depending on the state—must find the defendant to be permanently incorrigible before imposing life without parole. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 3:19 am by Edith Roberts
The first is Microsoft v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 6:03 am by Chris Wesner
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON TAGNETICS, INC., Appellant, v. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Inforrm also had a quick preview of the year ahead, marking its return from a winter break. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 4:50 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Reflections on FRAND 2023 marked a slight shift from the SEP-owner favourable position in the UK which followed Unwired Planet. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 2:04 pm
Superior Court, 54 Cal. 3d 868, 885 (1991) (citation and quotation marks omitted). [read post]