Search for: "Petite v. United States"
Results 9501 - 9520
of 13,108
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2010, 3:18 pm
United States, 430 U.S. 188 (1977)4 Notably, the Texas courts have not adopted the Marks reasoning as a way to resolve splits on the Texas Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 7:09 am
For these reasons, Austin’s petition was denied. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 7:39 am
Imaginary lines, real consequences: The effect of the militarization of the United States-Mexico border on Indigenous peoples. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 3:36 am
United States], in which the Supreme Court decided that the warrant-less seizure of the plaintiff’s cell phone records violated his Fourth Amendment rights. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 9:26 am
As a follow-up to last year’s blog on United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 2:20 pm
On Monday, April 16, the Court will hear argument in Powerex Corp. v. [read post]
6 May 2015, 4:32 am
He has filed his state-law intrusion-upon-seclusion claim against Paula, only (Count V). [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 4:15 pm
United States. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
Balkin identifies “four horsemen” that have caused constitutional rot in the United States: political polarization, economic inequality, loss of trust, and policy disasters. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 9:55 am
State v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 8:46 am
Salazar illustrates the care needed in seeking and enforcing an injunction against an agency of the United States. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 3:15 pm
From Rench v. [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm
All the other cases were decided under Step One or under an exception, such as United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 2:02 pm
NAACP and McAleenan v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 3:12 pm
Cir. 2022) Having found the dispute over the ’562 patent moot, the court next considered the proper disposition—whether to simply dismiss the appeal or also vacate the PTAB decision under United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 5:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Afro-Indian anti-counterfeit legislation debate; Legislation prompts India to send delegation to Africa (Spicy IP) (Afro-IP) (Afro-IP) Drug seizures in Frankfurt spark fears of EU-wide pattern (Intellectual Property Watch) General Broad plan on IP, innovation in developing countries approved at WHO (Intellectual Property Watch) World… [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 5:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Afro-Indian anti-counterfeit legislation debate; Legislation prompts India to send delegation to Africa (Spicy IP) (Afro-IP) (Afro-IP) Drug seizures in Frankfurt spark fears of EU-wide pattern (Intellectual Property Watch) General Broad plan on IP, innovation in developing countries approved at WHO (Intellectual Property Watch) World… [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 9:39 pm
United States, supra, at 175, 100 S.Ct., at 390. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 1:30 pm
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/284417.opn.doc.pdf Federal Law United States Supreme Court United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 9:20 am
Granville (2000) 530 U.S. 57, decided by the United States Supreme Court almost twelve years ago. [read post]
