Search for: "STATE v COUNTS"
Results 9501 - 9520
of 17,260
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2013, 9:54 am
The district court granted summary judgment on each count. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 7:03 am
Johnson (1989) and United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 2:49 pm
That doesn't count as the unauthorized practice of nursing under state law. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:30 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 5:09 am
State v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 1:31 am
(Again, it doesn't matter if it didn't prevail on some other patents -- only the wins really count.) [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 10:15 am
Even in Connecticut, the fucking Constitution State f'rgodssake, you might think that would count for something. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 8:19 pm
People v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 9:07 am
Prince v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 7:13 am
Rigidity v. flexibility: advocates for more specific defenses. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 6:00 am
In Stewart v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 1:41 pm
One piece of evidence from the 1976 House Report suggests that, though Congress didn’t think this through, it assumed that movies would count as derivative works with respect to songs without addressing the question of “derivative of what? [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 9:06 am
In the Microsoft v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 7:14 am
Reversed and remanded to the district court for further proceedings.Case Name: MICHAEL JESSE MUNOZ v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
The court found in favor of the party that had sold the assets, holding that the exception applied to sale to more than one person. 13.751 Similarly, ION Geophysical Corp. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
The blog has discussed this issue before, and the last time, the case went all the way to the Supreme Court.This time, in United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 6:26 am
The 62-page opinion essentially proceeds on two parallel tracks, one addressing Counts I-III, claims brought by private plaintiffs, primarily State National Bank of Big Spring, Texas (SNB), and the other Counts (IV-VI) that were principally brought by the States (the court noted that the private plaintiffs, while joining those counts, made no attempt to establish standing in their own right). [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
The recent order in Eggerling v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
The Roe v. [read post]
