Search for: "SUITS v. STATE"
Results 9501 - 9520
of 32,626
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2012, 11:00 am
The key legal point in this situation is that, according to case law, the foreign language interpreter is acting as the agent of the attorney (United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2006, 9:02 pm
Hollis has filed a defamation suit against the funny little website called dontdatehimgirl.com. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 8:15 am
This was the case of Northtec, LLC and American Zurich Insurance Company v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 6:19 am
In 2007, the Supreme Court ruled in a run-of-the-mill worker's compensation case, Entergy v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 9:28 pm
” The case cite is King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 11:35 am
Here, the Court relied squarely on the Supreme Court’s recent decision in American Electric Power v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 6:03 am
Thein The Supreme Court of the United States held in Dobbs v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 3:15 am
In Church v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 10:09 am
In the United States, for example, a person cannot bring a suit challenging the constitutionality of a law unless the plaintiff can demonstrate that the plaintiff is (or will be) harmed by the law. [read post]
13 Jun 2015, 4:25 pm
That morning, the captain of the 73-foot F/V KUPREANOF called in a MAYDAY to the Coast Guard stating that the boat was taking on water and sinking. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 1:27 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 7:51 am
The statute clearly states that registration is required. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 9:36 am
In United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 1:40 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 9:38 am
Ted Olson and David Boies, who fought opposing sides of Bush v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 10:11 am
The suit claimed that the fees charged bore no relationship and were grossly disproportionate to Morgan Stanley's actual transaction costs.According to the 7th Circuit panel, the Uniform Standards Act did not apply because any alleged misrepresentation that the stated HPI fee was tied to actual costs was not material to investor decisions to buy or sell securities. [read post]
19 May 2009, 8:51 am
Corp. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 6:40 am
The third case in the trilogy of securities antitrust immunity, United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 7:17 am
In Zbegner v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:29 am
The opinion from Judge Niemeyer, relying on the United States Supreme Court's June 2009 decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]
