Search for: "State v. B. V." Results 9501 - 9520 of 41,779
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2019, 4:28 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
“No defendant has a more real and personal stake in this lawsuit than Andrea and Matt do,” said Jon B. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 9:34 am by Daily Record Staff
In 2018, he filed a “Motion To Declare Guilty Plea Void And Of No Effect,” citing the court’s revisory power under Maryland Rule 4-331(b). [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 4:15 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division rejected Respondent's "factual parsing of the incident" and concluded that the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel precluded the ALJ from deciding again whether Petitioner's conduct amounted to physical abuse of the service recipient.Citing D'Arata v New York Cent. [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 8:22 pm
  She stated, at paras. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
After last week’s decision in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 3:55 pm by Keahn Morris and John Bolesta
Apparent Conflict Between Federal and State Law In seemingly direct conflict with these federal pronouncements are state cases like Dynamex v. [read post]
If the state chooses to intervene, the state attorney general commandeers the prosecution of the tax FCA action and the whistleblower retains a financial reward interest in any successful FCA claim.4 If the state attorney general does not prosecute or dismiss the tax FCA action, the relator is permitted to continue to prosecute the case on the state’s behalf.5 Generally, in a state tax FCA action, the plaintiff—whether the relator or the… [read post]