Search for: "State v. Doctor" Results 9501 - 9520 of 9,600
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2007, 12:05 am
The jury found that while Merck misled patients and doctors and suppressed information on risks, it did not fail to warn the patient, thus restricting recovery under state law. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 12:17 am
Last month a Texas federal judge granted lead plaintiffs' request to replace Lerach Coughlin in Archdiocese of Milwaukee Supporting Fund v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 4:57 am by Ricky E. Bagolie
If one class of proteins has more activity than the other class, an abnormal state exists and a person becomes either at risk of excessive clotting (thrombosis) or excessive bleeding. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 5:24 pm by Anthony Colleluori
Allow me to elaborate:In May of 2005, an Ivy-League educated physician (Rafiq Sabir aka "the Doctor,") was charged with agreeing to provide medical care to wounded "holy warriors" in Saudi Arabia, in an FBI sting United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 11:48 pm
The doctor tells you you have cancer and really you have an ulcer; you can sue. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 7:53 am
Reversing a summary judgement that had been granted to a company that operates Wendy's fast-food restaurants in Florida, the state's 4th District Court of Appeal ruled on February 14 in Byrd v. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 7:30 am
Circuit will rehear en banc, the case of Abigail Alliance v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 7:03 am
Solicitor General to supply the government's views on whether private medical clincis and doctors have a right to sue to enforce health care benefits for needy children under the federal-state Medicaid program. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 4:39 am
This month, in between his many surgeries and doctor's appointments, she travels to the state capital, pushing a bill that would legalize medical use of marijuana. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 3:07 am
  The Court has a post called McGill University Health Centre (Montreal General Hospital) v. [read post]
17 Feb 2007, 11:20 pm
Sullivan, the 1991 case upholding the "gag rule" that forbade doctors receiving federal Title X funds from even mentioning abortion to their patients. [read post]