Search for: "State v. Word"
Results 9501 - 9520
of 40,669
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2010, 10:15 am
McCormick v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 7:53 am
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.I'm back to the Second Amendment because of this comment, because I find my own views on the Second Amendment so at odds with how I see the world, and because, frankly, I haven't figured out just what I want to say about Judge Bolton's order in United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 8:07 pm
State v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 7:27 pm
TecSec, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 10:52 am
In US v. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 5:18 am
Pastor v. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 6:40 pm
Drobetsky v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 2:48 pm
We amended the legislation a long time ago to make the word “private” modify the word “study” and not the word “research”. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 5:15 pm
In other words, "[i]n the absence of record proof that the trial court complied with its [meaningful notice obligation] under CPL 310.30, a mode of proceedings error occurred requiring reversal" (People v Tabb, 13 NY3d 852, 853 [2009]). [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 9:29 am
The panel also extended the Wynne v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 9:29 am
The panel also extended the Wynne v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 9:29 am
The panel also extended the Wynne v. [read post]
16 Oct 2021, 1:01 am
Early on, the word “colonies” was determined to be anathema. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 1:52 pm
Is dissatisfaction with the current state of Section 2 jurisprudence a good enough reason to warrant application of Section 5? [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 4:37 am
Following the discussion about the utility of the Supreme Court stating a rule as to whether, and for how long, a car stop can be extended beyond its lawful justification, all of which arose out of the Supreme Court’s grant of cert in Rodriguez v. [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 4:48 am
The style of the case is, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 6:36 am
Figueroa v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 10:13 am
From today's Massachusetts high court opinion in Barron v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 3:27 am
In other words, Zurich would have incurred similar defence costs irrespective of the length of the period for which it had insured IEG. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 5:15 am
The February 17 Agreement states that it supersedes an earlier agreement dated August 10, 2011. . . . [read post]
