Search for: "Study v. State" Results 9501 - 9520 of 15,018
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2013, 2:51 pm by Jason Rantanen
Lefstin was a molecular biologist, studying mammalian gene regulatory mechanisms and DNA-protein interactions. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 1:30 pm by Sean Patrick Donlan
All of these jurisdictions are subjected to scrutiny by deploying a comparative case-based study. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 1:36 pm by WIMS
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 9:30 am by Karen Tani
Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex.Section 2. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 7:20 am by Andres
The orders I granted in Dramatico v Sky are likely to have been less easy to circumvent than the original order made in 20C Fox v BT (No 2) [...]. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 5:41 am by Susan Brenner
 All of these topics are beyond the ken of the average juror, and Dietz is well situated by his education, training, research, and academic study and writings to address these issues.U.S. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 9:26 pm by Aaron Barkoff
 Specifically, Classen alleged that the defendants' post-approval studies of vaccines were infringing activities, and the defendants argued that their participation in the vaccine studies was reasonably related to the FDA requirement to report adverse events to FDA, and was therefore encompassed by the safe harbor. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 1:00 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Study shows that as an absolute matter, fewer consumers understand information conveyed in one way v. another. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 7:24 am by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 3:45 pm
  Dr Hutchinson's notes stated that this selection was on the basis of in vitro potentiation studies. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:51 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Maureen O’Rourke: Merges’ empirical study showed courts trying to modulate patent rights across industries. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:26 am
Archbold 4-447 (f) suggests that where asked a judge should offer an explanation: “a reasonable doubt is the sort of doubt that might affect the mind of the of a person in dealing with matters of importance in his own affairs” Walters v R. [read post]