Search for: "United States v. Close" Results 9501 - 9520 of 14,201
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2012, 5:31 am by Gritsforbreakfast
A report by the Sunset Commission in 2010 found a 25% turnover rate among staff at youth prisons, down from a high of 48% turnover in 2007, but still among the highest of all state agencies.And while last I heard, TJJD has said it's meeting its 12-1 staffing ratio, the changing demographics of youth prisoners (less dangerous offenders diverted, more dangerous offenders concentrated into fewer units) may mean even that number is too high. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:36 am by Kelley Kaufman
  Last week, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision that surely will cause this trend to continue. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 7:07 am
Some tragedies just haunt you forever.Given that the only possible enforcement for Vienna violations would be action by the United Nations Security Council, in which the United States has a veto, it's hard to predict what will happen going forward. [read post]
18 Feb 2017, 4:37 am by Jordan Brunner
Flynn was forced to resign this week because of his discussion of U.S. sanctions on Russia with Russian ambassador to the United States Sergey Kislyak—discussions he earlier denied. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 5:22 am by William Ford
Alan Rozenshtein flagged a forthcoming article he wrote for the Yale Law Journal Forum arguing that the Supreme Court was wrong to conclude that the government needed a warrant to collect large quantities of cell-phone location data in United States v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 4:49 pm
The authors compare the court’s approach with that of courts in Spain, Switzerland, and the United States. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
It noted, quoting Justice Byron White’s concurring opinion in Furman v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 11:30 am by John Elwood
United States, 15-5238, out of the way. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
Rule in Clibbery v Allan In a sense, the case of Clibbery v Allan [2002] EWCA Civ 45, [200] Fam 261, [2002] 2 WLR 1511, [2002] 1 FLR 565 confirms my point; and it represents the common – (judge-made) – law, which cannot be overturned by a rule-maker. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 5:54 pm
"From 1990 through 2002, for instance, the Canadian Supreme Court cited decisions of the United States Supreme Court about a dozen times a year, an analysis by The New York Times found. [read post]