Search for: "WHITE v. STATE" Results 9501 - 9520 of 12,015
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2011, 2:31 am by SHG
The Court even said it was “not anxious to attribute a deliberate, intentional, and devious motive” to the Government.1  For an example of a court’s reluctance to make those findings, see United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 6:08 am by admin
  The us v. them mentality of the adversarial system is in our bones; it is our natural state since about age two, or our first utterance of “mine” and “I want”. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 7:23 am
In other words, if you are handed a suspicious white powder that you think might be cocaine, you cannot argue that you were unaware it was actually cocaine by simply remaining ignorant of that fact. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 8:58 pm by Amy Howe
He argued that he had that right after the Supreme Court’s 2017 decision in Peña-Rodriguez v. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 9:15 pm
I think that other countries in the World get along without a draft -- England is one -- and I don't see why we couldn't, too.'" Bond v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 11:14 pm
See: White House Suffers Loss in Email Case - Wall Street Journal. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 8:04 am by Lovechilde
And there were plenty of states where you couldn’t hold public office if you didn’t swear to believe in God (as opposed to Allah, Buddha or a flying plate of spaghetti) until the Torcaso v. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 2:05 pm by PunditMom
His apparent feminist awakening didn’t happen in the decade that the Supreme Court decided Roe v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 11:55 am
s 1954 ruling that struck down state laws establishing separate schools for black and white children. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 2:11 pm by Barbara Moreno
Mary Ziegler, Abortion and the Law in America:  Roe v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 1:30 pm by Steve Hall
Several states passed laws mandating or permitting the penalty following the Supreme Court's 1972 decision in Furman v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 9:48 am
Read Ars Technica coverage here.EU: ISP Filtering Mandate Would Violate EU Law, Court Rules On November 24, the European Court of Justice ruled in Scarlet v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 9:48 am
Read Ars Technica coverage here.EU: ISP Filtering Mandate Would Violate EU Law, Court Rules On November 24, the European Court of Justice ruled in Scarlet v. [read post]
23 May 2010, 8:33 am by Mary L. Dudziak
"Also reviewed this week: At the Edge of the Precipice: Henry Clay and the Compromise that Saved the Union by Robert V. [read post]
3 Jun 2017, 2:02 am by Jeremy Saland
In other words, if you were convicted in Westchester County Court, located in White Plains, New York, then your attorney would file a motion for sealing in that court. [read post]