Search for: "Warne v. State" Results 9501 - 9520 of 14,205
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2012, 12:00 am by Isabel McArdle
JD (Congo)  and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Public Law Project [2012] EWCA Civ 327 The Court of Appeal has considered the test for the second stage of appeal in immigration cases, when someone wishes to appeal from the Upper Tribunal to the Court of Appeal. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 4:59 pm by constitutional lawblogger
Mensing that federal prescription drug laws preempt plaintiffs' state failure-to-warn claims against generic drug manufacturers, even as it ruled three years again in Wyeth v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:46 am
 which, if passed, will require most video games to include a warning label that states: "WARNING: Exposure to violent video games has been linked to aggressive behavior. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 2:30 am
That ruling came down on June 23, 2011 and went in favor of generic drug maker in that it can’t be held liable for patients not being properly warned about drug side effects since the federal laws states that generic manufacturers are only required to post the same warnings on their drug labels as their brand name counterparts. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 3:46 pm by Zachary Spilman
CAAF heard oral argument last week in the Article 62 appeal case of United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 3:29 pm by Michael H. Cohen
Instead, they came about as a consequence of FDA’s decisions following a 1999 federal appeals court ruling (Pearson v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 11:48 am by William McGrath
Robert Khuzami, the SEC's Director of Enforcement stated that the SEC "applaud[ed] innovation in the capital markets," but warned that "new platforms and products must obey the rules and ensure … basic fairness and disclosure … . [read post]