Search for: "Wells v. Place"
Results 9501 - 9520
of 31,641
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2013, 10:10 am
The decision in City of Riverside v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 3:21 am
In addition to lots of marble, long usually uncrowded hallways, and spacious airy well-appointed courtrooms, you always find helpful but serious clerks. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 9:25 am
As is well established, judgments delivered in exercise of powers under Article 142 are not precedent and are generally not relied upon as having laid down principles as has been confirmed recently in State of Punjab v Rafiq Masih. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 9:40 am
Well, in Riley's case, that search led to the discovery of guns in the trunk.The cops also located Riley's cell phone in the car from which they promptly extracted digital data in its entirety. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 11:11 am
The Supreme Court today issued another opinion (American Express v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 1:25 pm
"With all the disclosures that have taken place over the past year, there's no valid reason these opinions are still secret," EFF Senior Counsel David Sobel said. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 7:01 am
Knox v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 10:13 am
A preliminary hearing took place to determine if type 2 diabetes meant that he was disabled under the Equality Act 2010. [read post]
9 May 2013, 8:25 am
In Afshan Multani v. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 5:11 pm
If you are watching the speech, here's a place to discuss it. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 9:26 pm
First, the goal of general deterrence is already addressed by the sentencing scheme put in place by the Legislature. [read post]
15 May 2013, 7:56 am
Under the terms of the proposed settlement in Padro v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 12:20 pm
The case is Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 8:47 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in Socko v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 3:24 pm
We've noted a number of such cases in recent weeks but take, for example, the recent decision of Cordy v. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 8:00 am
PRACTICAL GUIDANCE CUSTOMER EMAIL EDITION ON THE WEB Experience results today with practical guidance, legal research, and data-driven insights—all in one place. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 8:48 am
I commented on the case Milliken v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 8:03 pm
IPKat has a good piece on the decision here.One of the findings of the CJEU was that where a mark that is registered in black & white but used in a colour combination that is associated in the minds of the public with the proprietor of the mark (as is the case with the Specsavers mark), that colour combination is relevant for determining whether a likelihood of confusion takes place. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 7:05 am
The law would also bar marijuana from Schedule II classification as well, stipulating that an independent panel should determine whether it should be classified as a Schedule III through Schedule V. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 4:39 am
In Bien-Aime v. [read post]
