Search for: "A B" Results 9521 - 9540 of 158,551
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2020, 8:15 am by Howard Wasserman
The new Courts Law essay comes from Suzette Malveaux (Colorado), reviewing Stephen B. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 10:09 am
You can access the letters here: Region A; Region B; and Region C. [read post]
14 May 2016, 7:48 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Rank Downloads Paper Title 1 439 The Federal Circuits’ Second Amendment Doctrines David B. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 2:09 am by Paul Caron
The IRS's Whistleblower Office has released its FY 2012 annual report to Congress: In FY 2011, the Whistleblower Office paid the first claims under ยง 7623(b). [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 10:53 am by Doreen
The following actions may result in a prostitution charge: a) Any act committed with the intent to sexually arouse or gratify. b) Loitering in or around any public toilet for purposes of engaging in or soliciting any lewd, lascivious, or unlawful act. c) Loitering or wandering the streets or place to place without any apparent [...] [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 6:43 am
Back in January, I posted an entry that raised a hypothetical question about the interplay between Federal Rule of Evidence 803(8)(B) and Federal Rule of Evidence 803(10). [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:07 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Yesterday's post was the thirdt in a series of four posts dealing with adoptive admissions under Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(2)(B) based upon the following fact pattern: When Husband H confesses to Wife W that he had an affair with... [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 7:20 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
Similar to its federal counterpart, OCGA § 24–9–84.1(b) provides that Evidence of a conviction under subsection (a) of this Code section is not admissible if a period of more than ten years has elapsed since the date of the conviction... [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 2:25 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
Federal Rule of Evidence 804(b)(6) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay for A statement offered against a party that wrongfully caused — or acquiesced in wrongfully causing — the declarant’s unavailability as a witness, and did so intending... [read post]
18 Jan 2009, 3:00 pm
Recommended by Lawrence Solum on his Legal Theory Blog: "Originalism and Regulatory Takings: Why the Fifth Amendment May Not Protect Against Regulatory Takings, But the Fourteenth Amendment May" by Michael B. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 12:07 pm by Legal Profession
The web page of the Virginia State Bar reports: On July 17, 2013, the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board suspended Matthew B. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 7:02 am by pvwlaw
Some of the key adjustments for defined contribution plans (including 401(k), 403(b), 457 and profit sharing plans) include: The maximum salary deferral…Read more › [read post]