Search for: "Ames v. Ames"
Results 9521 - 9540
of 28,722
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2018, 12:27 pm
MBNA Am. [read post]
21 May 2012, 12:54 pm
In Burnip v Birmingham CC, Trengove v Walsall MBC, and Gorry v Wiltshire C [2012] EWCA Civ 629, the Court of Appeal considered whether the application of the bedroom rule in the housing benefit regulations as regards private rented accommodation discriminated against those who needed an extra bedroom for a carer or because their children could not share a room as a result of disability (see here for our discussion of the Upper Tribunal decisions). [read post]
21 May 2012, 12:54 pm
In Burnip v Birmingham CC, Trengove v Walsall MBC, and Gorry v Wiltshire C [2012] EWCA Civ 629, the Court of Appeal considered whether the application of the bedroom rule in the housing benefit regulations as regards private rented accommodation discriminated against those who needed an extra bedroom for a carer or because their children could not share a room as a result of disability (see here for our discussion of the Upper Tribunal decisions). [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:08 am
”) Published: 3/1/2010 10:03 AM [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 6:05 am
(A.) v Ryan, [1997] 1 SCR 157. 9. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 3:00 am
Truckstops of Am., 915 S.W.2d at 428; Ridings v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 4:52 am
Co. v North Am. [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 12:26 pm
In Ames v. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 11:21 am
Clair v. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 7:38 am
Jansen v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 9:27 pm
In today’s case (Gignac v. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 2:18 am
Diamonair USA, Inc., Opposition No. 91163668 [Section 2(d) opposition to DIAMONICE for jewelry, based up the registered mark DIAMONIQUE for jewelry].April 24, 2007 - 10 AM: In re Avery Dennison Corp., Serial Nos. 78564892 and 78563257 [Refusal of the phrase HELLO MY NAME IS in standard character and design form (below) for "paper name tags and paper labels" on the ground that the phrase is merely informational and does not function as a trademark].April 24, 2007 - 2 PM: In re XE… [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 8:26 pm
Am. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 6:41 am
See 14 Am. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 7:36 pm
So far, I am happy.The Court then reviewed the history of the substantial transformation test from its roots in the 1908 Supreme Court decision Anheuser Busch Brewing Ass’n v. [read post]
6 Jul 2024, 7:25 am
Mid-Am. [read post]
6 Jul 2024, 7:25 am
Mid-Am. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 7:06 am
In McKay v. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 9:09 am
We got enough material from this morning's hearing in Sullivan & Cromwell v. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 4:22 pm
In a recent decision, Devore-Thompson v. [read post]
